Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房(ICU)患者使用桡动脉或足背动脉进行长期动脉置管。

Long-term arterial cannulation in ICU patients using the radial artery or dorsalis pedis artery.

作者信息

Martin C, Saux P, Papazian L, Gouin F

机构信息

ICU and Anesthesia Department, Marseilles School of Medicine and Hopital Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Chest. 2001 Mar;119(3):901-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.3.901.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of arterial thrombosis and catheter-related infection following radial artery or dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) cannulations lasting > or = 4 days.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study of two cohorts of ICU patients.

SETTING

ICU of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

In a first group of 131 consecutive patients, the DPA was selected for arterial cannulation. In the second group, 134 consecutive patients were considered for radial artery cannulation.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In the DPA group, the overall success rate for catheter placement was 85%. Patients were cannulated for 16 +/- 5 days (mean +/- SD). In the radial artery group, the overall success rate was 97.7% (129 of 132 patients; p < 0.0001 vs DPA group). Patients were cannulated for 13.3 +/- 4.0 days. In both groups, no signs of ischemia were detected at the clinical examination. In the DPA group, no thrombosis was detected at the angiographic examination in 21 patients (38%), a thrombosis without vessel obstruction was observed in 21 patients (31%), and a thrombosis with vessel obstruction was observed in 21 patients (31%). In the radial artery group, no thrombosis was observed in 31 patients (24%; not significant vs DPA group), a partial thrombosis was found in 73 patients (57%), and a total thrombosis with vessel obstruction was found in 25 patients (19%). Two cases of catheter-related infection were observed in the DPA group. In the radial artery group, four cases of catheter-related infection were diagnosed vs DPA group (not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of serious complications was similar for both sites of arterial cannulation. Accepting a 12.7% lower rate of successful placement, the DPA route provides a safe and easily available alternative when radial arteries are not accessible.

摘要

研究目的

评估桡动脉或足背动脉(DPA)置管持续时间≥4天时动脉血栓形成和导管相关感染的发生率。

设计

对两组重症监护病房(ICU)患者进行前瞻性观察研究。

地点

一所大学医院的ICU。

患者

第一组为131例连续患者,选择DPA进行动脉置管。第二组为134例连续患者,考虑进行桡动脉置管。

测量与结果

在DPA组,导管置入的总体成功率为85%。患者置管时间为16±5天(均值±标准差)。在桡动脉组,总体成功率为97.7%(132例患者中的129例;与DPA组相比,p<0.0001)。患者置管时间为13.3±4.0天。两组在临床检查中均未发现缺血迹象。在DPA组,21例患者(38%)血管造影检查未发现血栓,21例患者(31%)观察到无血管阻塞的血栓形成,21例患者(31%)观察到有血管阻塞的血栓形成。在桡动脉组,31例患者(24%)未观察到血栓形成(与DPA组相比无显著差异),73例患者(57%)发现部分血栓形成,25例患者(19%)发现有血管阻塞的完全血栓形成。DPA组观察到2例导管相关感染。在桡动脉组,诊断出4例导管相关感染,与DPA组相比无显著差异。

结论

两个动脉置管部位的严重并发症发生率相似。在桡动脉不可用时,接受成功率低12.7%的情况下,DPA途径提供了一种安全且易于实施的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验