• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The symptoms and functioning severity scale (SFSS): psychometric evaluation and discrepancies among youth, caregiver, and clinician ratings over time.症状和功能严重程度量表 (SFSS):随着时间的推移,青少年、照顾者和临床医生评分的心理测量评估和差异。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0403-2.
2
The relationship between change in therapeutic alliance ratings and improvement in youth symptom severity: whose ratings matter the most?治疗联盟评分变化与青少年症状严重程度改善之间的关系:谁的评分最重要?
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):78-89. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0398-0.
3
Validation and use of the youth and caregiver Treatment Outcome Expectations Scale (TOES) to assess the relationships between expectations, pretreatment characteristics, and outcomes.验证和使用青少年和照顾者治疗结果期望量表(TOES)来评估期望、治疗前特征和结果之间的关系。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):90-103. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0406-z.
4
Characterizing Youth-Caregiver Concordance and Discrepancies in Psychopathology Symptoms in a US Community Sample.描述美国社区样本中青少年-照顾者在精神病理学症状上的一致性和差异性。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Nov;43(11):1004-1013. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2022.2099494. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS) Short Forms with Out-of-Home Care Youth.针对离家照料青少年的症状与功能严重程度量表(SFSS)简表的心理测量评估。
Child Youth Care Forum. 2015 Apr 1;44(2):239-249. doi: 10.1007/s10566-014-9280-z.
6
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in caregivers of clinically-referred youth: psychometric properties and mediation analysis.临床转介青少年照顾者生活满意度量表(SWLS):心理测量特性和中介分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0390-8.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of the youth and caregiver Service Satisfaction Scale.青少年和照顾者服务满意度量表的编制与心理测量学评价。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0407-y.
8
Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale-PTPB Version (BMSLSS-PTPB): psychometric properties and relationship with mental health symptom severity over time.简要多维学生生活满意度量表-PTPB 版(BMSLSS-PTPB):心理测量学特性及其与随时间推移的心理健康症状严重程度的关系。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0385-5.
9
Caregiver life satisfaction: relationship to youth symptom severity through treatment.照顾者生活满意度:与青少年症状严重程度的治疗关系。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012;41(4):433-44. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.684273. Epub 2012 May 9.
10
The Transdiagnostic Global Impression - Psychopathology scale (TGI-P): Initial development of a novel transdiagnostic tool for assessing, tracking, and visualising psychiatric symptom severity in everyday practice.跨诊断全球印象-精神病理学量表(TGI-P):一种新的跨诊断工具的初步开发,用于在日常实践中评估、跟踪和可视化精神症状严重程度。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024 Nov;88:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.07.012. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of adolescent psychotherapy outcomes using youth- and caregiver-reported symptoms data.利用青少年和照顾者报告的症状数据预测青少年心理治疗结果。
Psychother Res. 2024 Aug 30:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2394187.
2
A semi-structured interview for the dimensional assessment of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children and adolescents: Interview Version of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale (SFSS-I).用于儿童和青少年内化与外化症状维度评估的半结构化访谈:症状与功能严重程度量表访谈版(SFSS-I)
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Aug 24;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00788-y.
3
Implementing Measurement-Based Care in a Youth Partial Hospital Setting: Leveraging Feedback for Sustainability.在青少年部分住院环境中实施基于测量的护理:利用反馈实现可持续性。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):128-145. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01358-2. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
4
Service Utilization for Parent Management of Early Childhood Behavior Problems in a Private Outpatient Behavioral Clinic: The Impact of Out-of-Pocket Cost, Travel Distance, and Initial Treatment Progress.私人门诊行为诊所中幼儿行为问题家长管理服务的利用:自付费用、出行距离和初始治疗进展的影响。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Sep;50(5):834-847. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01282-x. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Detecting Clinically Relevant Emotional Distress and Functional Impairment in Children and Adolescents: Protocol for an Automated Speech Analysis Algorithm Development Study.检测儿童和青少年临床上相关的情绪困扰和功能损害:自动语音分析算法开发研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 23;12:e46970. doi: 10.2196/46970.
6
Concordance between youth and caregiver report of eating disorder psychopathology: Development and psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder-15 for Parents/Caregivers (ED-15-P).青少年与照料者进食障碍心理病理学报告的一致性:父母/照料者进食障碍-15 量表(ED-15-P)的编制及心理测量学特性。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jul;54(7):1302-1306. doi: 10.1002/eat.23557. Epub 2021 May 22.
7
Measurement-based care as a practice improvement tool: Clinical and organizational applications in youth mental health.基于测量的照护作为一种实践改进工具:在青少年心理健康中的临床与组织应用
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020;5(3):233-250. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2020.1784062. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
A brief session-by-session measure of eating disorder psychopathology for children and adolescents: Development and psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder-15 for Youth (ED-15-Y).一种用于儿童和青少年进食障碍心理病理学的简短逐会话评估工具:青少年进食障碍-15 项量表(ED-15-Y)的编制及心理测量学特性。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Apr;54(4):569-577. doi: 10.1002/eat.23449. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Evidence Base Update for Brief, Free, and Accessible Youth Mental Health Measures.简短、免费、易获取的青少年心理健康措施的证据基础更新。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 Jan-Feb;49(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2019.1689824. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Client feedback in psychological therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems.针对有心理健康问题的儿童和青少年的心理治疗中的客户反馈。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD011729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011729.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Peabody Treatment Progress Battery: history and methods for developing a comprehensive measurement battery for youth mental health.皮博迪治疗进展成套测验:为青少年心理健康发展综合测量成套测验的历史和方法。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0404-1.
2
Motivation for youth's treatment scale (MYTS): a new tool for measuring motivation among youths and their caregivers.青少年治疗动机量表(MYTS):一种用于测量青少年及其照顾者治疗动机的新工具。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):118-32. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0408-x.
3
Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: results of a randomized trial.常规反馈给临床医生对青少年心理健康结果的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1423-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.002052011.
4
Are clinicians' assessments of improvements in children's functioning "global"?临床医生对儿童功能改善的评估是否“全面”?
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(2):281-94. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.546043.
5
Internal consistency and associated characteristics of informant discrepancies in clinic referred youths age 11 to 17 years.临床转介的 11 至 17 岁青少年中知情者差异的内部一致性和相关特征。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):36-53. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533402.
6
Introduction to the special section: More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents.特刊介绍:不只是测量误差:在儿童和青少年的临床评估中发现信息提供者差异背后的意义。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533405.
7
Understanding discrepancies in parent-child reporting of emotional and behavioural problems: Effects of relational and socio-demographic factors.理解父母与子女在情绪和行为问题报告中的差异:关系和社会人口因素的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 16;10:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-56.
8
Description and psychometric evaluation of the Youth Counseling Impact Scale.《青少年咨询效果量表》的描述和心理计量学评估。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):259-68. doi: 10.1037/a0018507.
9
Cross-informant agreement of the Dysregulation Profile of the Child Behavior Checklist.儿童行为检查表失调特征的跨报告者一致性。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Aug 15;178(3):550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 May 26.
10
The effects of parent participation on child psychotherapy outcome: a meta-analytic review.父母参与对儿童心理治疗结果的影响:一项元分析综述。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;39(2):151-62. doi: 10.1080/15374410903532585.

症状和功能严重程度量表 (SFSS):随着时间的推移,青少年、照顾者和临床医生评分的心理测量评估和差异。

The symptoms and functioning severity scale (SFSS): psychometric evaluation and discrepancies among youth, caregiver, and clinician ratings over time.

机构信息

Center for Evaluation and Program Improvement, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Mar;39(1-2):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0403-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-012-0403-2
PMID:22407556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3564495/
Abstract

This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the symptoms and functioning severity scale (SFSS), which includes three parallel forms to systematically capture clinician, youth, and caregiver perspectives of youth symptoms on a frequent basis. While there is widespread consensus that different raters of youth psychopathology vary significantly in their assessment, this is the first paper that specifically investigated the discrepancies among clinician, youth, and caregiver ratings throughout the treatment process within a community mental health setting. Results for all three respondent versions indicated the SFSS is a psychometrically sound instrument for use in this population. Significant discrepancies in scores existed at baseline among the three respondents. Longitudinal analyses reveal the youth-clinician and caregiver-clinician score discrepancies decreased significantly over time. Differences by youth gender existed for caregiver-clinician discrepancies. The average youth-caregiver score discrepancy remained consistent throughout treatment. Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.

摘要

本文描述了症状和功能严重程度量表(SFSS)的开发和心理计量学评估,该量表包括三个平行形式,旨在系统地频繁捕捉临床医生、青少年和照顾者对青少年症状的看法。虽然人们普遍认为,青少年精神病理学的不同评估者在评估中存在显著差异,但这是第一篇专门在社区心理健康环境中调查治疗过程中临床医生、青少年和照顾者评分差异的论文。所有三个应答者版本的结果均表明,SFSS 是一种在该人群中使用的具有良好心理计量学特性的工具。在基线时,三个应答者的分数存在显著差异。纵向分析显示,青少年-临床医生和照顾者-临床医生的评分差异随时间显著降低。青少年性别对照顾者-临床医生的差异存在影响。在整个治疗过程中,青少年-照顾者的平均评分差异保持一致。讨论了对未来研究和临床实践的影响。