Suppr超能文献

糖尿病风险评估工具调查:概念、结构和性能。

Survey of diabetes risk assessment tools: concepts, structure and performance.

机构信息

Discipline of Pharmacy and Experimental Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Sep;28(6):485-98. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2296.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to review the effectiveness and limitations of existing diabetes risk screening tools to assess the need for further developing of such tools. An electronic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library supplemented by a manual search was performed from 1995-2010. The search retrieved a total of 2168 articles reporting diabetes risk assessment tools which, after culling, produced 41 tools developed in 22 countries, with the majority (n = 26) developed in North America and Europe. All are short questionnaires of 2-16 questions incorporating common variables including age, gender, waist circumference, BMI, family history of diabetes, history of hypertension or antihypertensive medications. While scoring format and cut-offs point are diverse between questionnaires, overall accuracy value range of 40-97%, 24-86% and 62-87% were reported for sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve respectively. In summary, there is a trend of increasing availability of diabetes prediction tools with the existing risk assessment tools being generally a short questionnaire aiming for ease of use in clinical practice. The overall performance of existing tools showed moderate to high accuracy in their predictive performance. However, further detailed comparison of existing questionnaires is needed to evaluate whether they can serve adequately as diabetes risk assessment tool in clinical practice.

摘要

本研究旨在回顾现有的糖尿病风险筛查工具的有效性和局限性,以评估进一步开发此类工具的必要性。我们对 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了电子检索,并辅以手工检索,检索范围为 1995 年至 2010 年。检索共获取了 2168 篇报道糖尿病风险评估工具的文章,经过筛选后,共得到 41 种工具,这些工具分别在 22 个国家开发,其中大部分(n=26)来自北美和欧洲。所有工具均为 2-16 个问题的简短问卷,包含常见变量,包括年龄、性别、腰围、BMI、糖尿病家族史、高血压或降压药物史。尽管问卷的评分格式和截断点各不相同,但报告的敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线的准确性值范围分别为 40-97%、24-86%和 62-87%。总之,随着糖尿病预测工具的可用性不断增加,现有的风险评估工具通常是一种旨在便于临床实践使用的简短问卷。现有工具的整体性能在预测性能方面表现出中等至高度的准确性。然而,需要进一步详细比较现有的问卷,以评估它们是否能够充分作为临床实践中的糖尿病风险评估工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验