Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7951, USA.
Hum Factors. 2012 Feb;54(1):36-51. doi: 10.1177/0018720811427901.
The purpose of this article is to present and expand on current theories and measurement techniques for assessing team workload.
To date, little research has been conducted on the workload experienced by teams. A validated theory describing team workload, which includes an account of its relation to individual workload, has not been articulated.
The authors review several theoretical approaches to team workload.Within the team research literature, attempts to evaluate team workload have typically relied on measures of individual workload. This assumes that such measures retain their validity at the team level of measurement, but empirical research suggests that this method may lack sensitivity to the drivers of team workload.
On the basis of these reviews, the authors advance suggestions concerning a comprehensive theory of team workload and methods for assessing it in team settings. The approaches reviewed include subjective, performance, physiological, and strategy shift measures. Theoretical and statistical difficulties associated with aggregating individual-level workload responses to a team-level measure are discussed.
Conception and measurement of team workload have not significantly matured alongside developments in individual workload.
Team workload remains a complex research area without simple measurement solutions, but as a research domain it remains open for contributions from interested and enterprising researchers.
本文旨在介绍和扩展当前用于评估团队工作量的理论和测量技术。
迄今为止,针对团队所经历的工作量,相关研究甚少。尚未明确阐述一种描述团队工作量的经过验证的理论,其中包括其与个体工作量的关系。
作者回顾了几种团队工作量的理论方法。在团队研究文献中,评估团队工作量的尝试通常依赖于个体工作量的测量。这假设这些测量在团队测量水平上仍然有效,但实证研究表明,这种方法可能对团队工作量的驱动因素缺乏敏感性。
基于这些综述,作者提出了关于团队工作量综合理论以及在团队环境中评估其的方法的建议。所回顾的方法包括主观、绩效、生理和策略转变的测量。讨论了将个体层面的工作量响应聚合到团队层面测量所涉及的理论和统计难题。
团队工作量的概念和测量并没有随着个体工作量的发展而显著成熟。
团队工作量仍然是一个复杂的研究领域,没有简单的测量解决方案,但作为一个研究领域,它仍然向有兴趣和有进取心的研究人员开放。