Salas Eduardo, Grossman Rebecca, Hughes Ashley M, Coultas Chris W
University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York.
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):365-74. doi: 10.1177/0018720815578267.
The aim of this study was to review literature relevant to cohesion measurement, explore developing measurement approaches, and provide theoretical and practical recommendations for optimizing cohesion measurement.
Cohesion is essential for team effectiveness and performance, leading researchers to focus attention on understanding how to enhance it. However, cohesion is inconsistently defined and measured, making it difficult to compare findings across studies and limiting the ability to advance science and practice.
We reviewed empirical research through which we uncovered specific information about cohesion's conceptualization, measurement, and relationships with performance, culminating in a set of current trends from which we provide suggestions and possible solutions to guide future efforts and help the field converge toward greater consistency.
Cohesion demonstrates more significant relationships with performance when conceptualized using social and task (but not other) dimensions and when analyses are performed at the team level. Cohesion is inherently temporal, yet researchers rarely measure cohesion at multiple points during the life of a team. Finally, cohesion matters in large, dynamic collectives, complicating measurement. However, innovative and unobtrusive methodologies are being used, which we highlight.
Practitioners and researchers are encouraged to define cohesion with task and social subdimensions and to measure with behavioral and attitudinal operationalizations. Individual and team-oriented items are recommended, though team-level analyses are most effective. Innovative/unobtrusive methods should be further researched to enable cohesion measurement longitudinally and in large, dynamic collectives.
By applying our findings and conclusions, researchers and practitioners will be more likely to find consistent, reliable, and significant cohesion-to-performance relationships.
本研究旨在回顾与凝聚力测量相关的文献,探索新的测量方法,并为优化凝聚力测量提供理论和实践建议。
凝聚力对于团队效能和绩效至关重要,促使研究人员专注于理解如何增强凝聚力。然而,凝聚力的定义和测量并不一致,这使得跨研究比较结果变得困难,并限制了推动科学和实践发展的能力。
我们回顾了实证研究,从中发现了关于凝聚力的概念化、测量及其与绩效关系的具体信息,最终形成了一系列当前趋势,并据此提供建议和可能的解决方案,以指导未来的研究工作,帮助该领域朝着更大的一致性发展。
当使用社会和任务(而非其他)维度进行概念化,且在团队层面进行分析时,凝聚力与绩效之间的关系更为显著。凝聚力本质上具有时间性,但研究人员很少在团队生命周期的多个时间点测量凝聚力。最后,凝聚力在大型动态群体中很重要,这使得测量变得复杂。然而,我们强调正在使用创新且不引人注目的方法。
鼓励从业者和研究人员用任务和社会子维度来定义凝聚力,并通过行为和态度操作化进行测量。建议采用面向个人和团队的项目,不过团队层面的分析最为有效。应进一步研究创新/不引人注目的方法,以便在大型动态群体中纵向测量凝聚力。
通过应用我们的研究结果和结论,研究人员和从业者更有可能发现凝聚力与绩效之间一致、可靠且显著的关系。