Kennedy-Metz Lauren R, Conboy Heather M, Liu Anna, Dias Roger D, Harari Rayan E, Gikandi Ajami, Shapeton Alexander, Clarke Lori A, Osterweil Leon J, Avrunin George S, Chaspari Theodora, Yule Steven, Zenati Marco A
Department of Psychology, Roanoke College, Salem, Va; Medical Robotics & Computer-Assisted Surgery Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Mass.
Manning College of Information & Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Mass.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.050.
To characterize cognitive workload (CWL) of cardiac surgery team members in a real-world setting during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery using providers' heart rate variability (HRV) data as a surrogate measure of CWL.
HRV was collected from the surgeon, anesthesiologist, perfusionist, and scrub nurse, and audio/video recordings were made during isolated, nonemergency CABG surgeries (n = 27). Eight surgical phases were annotated by trained researchers, and HRV was calculated for each phase.
Significant differences in CWL were observed within a given role across surgical phases. Results are reported as predicted probability (95% confidence interval [CI]). CWL was significantly higher for anesthesiologists during "preparation and induction" (0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.71) and "anastomoses" (0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.58) compared to other phases, and the same held for nurses during the "opening" (0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.65) and "postoperative" (0.68; 95% CI, 0.42-0.86) phases. Additional significant differences were observed between roles within a given surgical phase. For example, surgeons had significantly higher CWL during "anastomoses" (0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.89) compared to all other phases, and the same was true of perfusionists during the "opening" (0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88) and "prebypass preparation" (0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.64) phases.
Our innovative analysis demonstrates that CWL fluctuates across surgical procedures by role and phase, which may reflect the distribution of primary tasks. This corroborates earlier findings from self-report measures. The data suggest that team-wide, peak CWL during a phase decreases from early phases of surgery through initiation of cardiopumonary bypass (CPB), rises during anastomosis, and decreases after termination of CPB. Knowledge of these trends could encourage the adoption of behaviors to enhance team dynamics and performance.
在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术的实际场景中,使用医疗人员的心率变异性(HRV)数据作为认知工作量(CWL)的替代指标,来描述心脏外科手术团队成员的认知工作量。
在孤立的非急诊CABG手术(n = 27)期间,收集外科医生、麻醉师、灌注师和洗手护士的HRV,并进行音频/视频记录。由训练有素的研究人员对八个手术阶段进行标注,并计算每个阶段的HRV。
在给定角色内,不同手术阶段的CWL存在显著差异。结果以预测概率(95%置信区间[CI])报告。与其他阶段相比,麻醉师在“准备和诱导”阶段(0.57;95% CI,0.42 - 0.71)和“吻合”阶段(0.44;95% CI,0.30 - 0.58)的CWL显著更高,护士在“切开”阶段(0.51;95% CI,0.37 - 0.65)和“术后”阶段(0.68;95% CI,0.42 - 0.86)也是如此。在给定手术阶段内,不同角色之间也观察到了其他显著差异。例如,与所有其他阶段相比,外科医生在“吻合”阶段(0.81;95% CI,0.69 - 0.89)的CWL显著更高,灌注师在“切开”阶段(0.79;95% CI,0.66 - 0.88)和“体外循环前准备”阶段(0.50;95% CI,0.36 - 0.64)也是如此。
我们的创新性分析表明,CWL会因角色和阶段的不同而在手术过程中波动,这可能反映了主要任务的分配情况。这证实了早期自我报告测量的结果。数据表明,在一个阶段内,全团队的CWL峰值从手术早期到体外循环(CPB)开始时降低,在吻合阶段升高,在CPB结束后降低。了解这些趋势可能会促使人们采取行为来增强团队动态和绩效。