Suppr超能文献

基频范围的跨语言差异:英语和德语的比较。

Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German.

机构信息

ESRC Centre for Research on Bilingualism and School of Linguistics and English Language, Bangor University, 37-41 College Road, Bangor, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Mar;131(3):2249-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3681950.

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic comparison of various measures of f0 range in female speakers of English and German. F0 range was analyzed along two dimensions, level (i.e., overall f0 height) and span (extent of f0 modulation within a given speech sample). These were examined using two types of measures, one based on "long-term distributional" (LTD) methods, and the other based on specific landmarks in speech that are linguistic in nature ("linguistic" measures). The various methods were used to identify whether and on what basis or bases speakers of these two languages differ in f0 range. Findings yielded significant cross-language differences in both dimensions of f0 range, but effect sizes were found to be larger for span than for level, and for linguistic than for LTD measures. The linguistic measures also uncovered some differences between the two languages in how f0 range varies through an intonation contour. This helps shed light on the relation between intonational structure and f0 range.

摘要

本文对英语和德语女性说话者的 f0 范围的各种测量方法进行了系统比较。f0 范围沿着两个维度进行分析,即水平(即整体 f0 高度)和跨度(给定语音样本中 f0 调制的程度)。这两个维度使用两种类型的测量方法进行了检查,一种基于“长期分布”(LTD)方法,另一种基于语音中的特定语言性地标(“语言”测量)。各种方法用于确定这两种语言的说话者在 f0 范围上是否存在差异以及基于何种基础或根据存在差异。研究结果表明,f0 范围的两个维度均存在显著的跨语言差异,但跨度的效应量大于水平,语言测量的效应量大于 LTD 测量。语言测量还揭示了两种语言在语调轮廓中 f0 范围变化方式上的一些差异。这有助于阐明语调结构与 f0 范围之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验