University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
EuroIntervention. 2012 Mar;7(11):1293-300. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I11A204.
The percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains hampered by suboptimal results, mainly in the side branch (SB), even with the use of drug-eluting stents. Dedicated bifurcation stents could provide an attractive alternative to improve early outcomes and reduce SB restenosis. We aimed to assess in a prospective single-arm multicentre registry, safety and effectiveness at 6-month clinical follow-up of the Tryton dedicated side branch (SB) stent.
In this prospective international registry, patients with coronary bifurcation lesions underwent treatment with a dedicated stenting technique using the Tryton stent, in conjunction with a "workhorse" main branch (MB) stent (drug-eluting or bare metal). The Tryton stent is specifically designed for bifurcations, with minimal strut/vessel ratio in the proximal MB, providing full strut coverage at the SB ostium, with short stent length in the SB and with the ability to adapt to the wide spectrum of bifurcation angles and sizes. The primary endpoint was 6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularisation). Secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success (respectively defined as successful implantation of Tryton at the intended lesion and successful performance of the whole procedure with Tryton without in-hospital MACE). A total of 302 patients were enrolled. Of these, 296 had 6-month data available for evaluation. Technical and procedural success occurred in 98.0% (95% confidence interval: 95.7%-99.1%) and 94.4% (91.2%-96.5%) patients, respectively. The cumulative 6-month MACE rate was 6.4% (4.2%-9.7%), including 4.7% (2.9%-7.7%) myocardial infarctions (3.7% periprocedural), and 3.4% (2.0%-6.1%) target lesion revascularisations (2.4% in the MB, 0.7% in the SB, and 0.3% in both MB and SB). One stent thrombosis (0.3% [0%-1.6%]) occurred.
The treatment of bifurcation lesions with a dedicated Tryton stent is safe and feasible, with good technical and procedural success, very low revascularisation, MACE and stent thrombosis rates at 6-month clinical follow-up.
经皮冠状动脉分叉病变的治疗仍不理想,主要是侧支(SB),即使使用药物洗脱支架也是如此。专用分叉支架可以提供一种有吸引力的替代方法,以改善早期结果并降低 SB 再狭窄。我们旨在前瞻性单臂多中心注册研究中评估 Tryton 专用侧支(SB)支架在 6 个月临床随访时的安全性和有效性。
在这项前瞻性国际注册研究中,冠状动脉分叉病变患者接受了专用支架技术治疗,使用 Tryton 支架,同时使用“主力”主干(MB)支架(药物洗脱或裸金属)。Tryton 支架专为分叉设计,MB 近端的最小支柱/血管比,在 SB 开口处提供完全支柱覆盖,SB 段支架长度短,并能够适应广泛的分叉角度和大小。主要终点为 6 个月主要不良心脏事件(MACE:心脏死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建)。次要终点为技术和程序成功(分别定义为 Tryton 成功植入目标病变和 Tryton 成功完成整个程序,无院内 MACE)。共纳入 302 例患者。其中,296 例有 6 个月数据可供评估。技术和程序成功率分别为 98.0%(95%置信区间:95.7%-99.1%)和 94.4%(91.2%-96.5%)。累积 6 个月 MACE 发生率为 6.4%(4.2%-9.7%),包括 4.7%(2.9%-7.7%)心肌梗死(3.7%围手术期)和 3.4%(2.0%-6.1%)靶病变血运重建(MB 2.4%,SB 0.7%,MB 和 SB 各 0.3%)。发生 1 例支架血栓形成(0.3%[0%-1.6%])。
专用 Tryton 支架治疗分叉病变安全可行,技术和程序成功率高,6 个月临床随访时再血管化、MACE 和支架血栓形成率低。