Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University St, room 276, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4 Canada.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
The ventromedial frontal lobe (VMF) plays a role in decision making, but its precise function remains unclear. Several lines of evidence suggest that VMF is involved in representing the economic value of options. A prior study from our lab has shown that patients with lesions to the VMF are less consistent than controls in making simple preference judgments between stimuli presented in pairs. Here, we followed up that observation in a larger sample, using more sensitive tasks, and examining the category-specificity of this effect. Patients with damage to VMF (N=15) were compared to patients with frontal damage sparing that region (N=8) and to demographically matched healthy control participants (N=23). Five separate preference tasks were administered, requiring subjects to indicate their preference for 12 stimuli presented two at a time, in all possible combinations. Categories included fruits, vegetables, colors, landscapes, and puppies. Choices were analyzed for internal consistency, and decision times were measured. Three control tasks with the same format, but requiring perceptual judgments, were also administered. VMF patients were significantly more erratic than both non-VMF and healthy control participants in their preference judgments across all stimulus categories. However, decision times, and the relationship between decision time and relative value, were similar to that seen in control participants. The groups did not differ in perceptual judgment performance. These findings add further weight to the claim that VMF plays a critical role in simple value-based decision-making under conditions of certainty. This region appears to be necessary for consistent choices across a variety of stimulus categories, supporting the view that human VMF represents the (relative) value of decision options rather generally. That such damage impairs decision 'accuracy' without affecting reaction time has implications for theories of the role of VMF in decision-making, arguing that this region may be critical for linking a particular value to a particular option.
腹内侧前额叶(VMF)在决策中起作用,但它的确切功能尚不清楚。有几条证据表明,VMF 参与了对选项的经济价值的表示。我们实验室的一项先前研究表明,与对照组相比,VMF 损伤的患者在对成对呈现的刺激进行简单偏好判断时的一致性较差。在这里,我们在更大的样本中进行了随访,使用了更敏感的任务,并检查了这种效应的类别特异性。将 VMF 损伤的患者(N=15)与该区域未受损伤的额叶损伤患者(N=8)和年龄匹配的健康对照组参与者(N=23)进行比较。进行了五项单独的偏好任务,要求受试者在所有可能的组合中,每次同时表示对 12 个刺激的偏好。类别包括水果、蔬菜、颜色、风景和小狗。对选择进行了内部一致性分析,并测量了决策时间。还进行了三个具有相同格式但需要知觉判断的对照任务。在所有刺激类别中,VMF 患者的偏好判断比非 VMF 患者和健康对照组参与者都更为不稳定。然而,决策时间以及决策时间与相对价值之间的关系与对照组相似。三个组在知觉判断表现上没有差异。这些发现进一步支持了 VMF 在确定性条件下进行简单基于价值的决策中起关键作用的说法。该区域似乎是在各种刺激类别中做出一致选择所必需的,支持人类 VMF 普遍表示决策选项的(相对)价值的观点。这种损伤会损害决策的“准确性”而不影响反应时间,这对 VMF 在决策中的作用理论具有影响,表明该区域可能对将特定价值与特定选项联系起来至关重要。