Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.
J Neurosci. 2019 May 22;39(21):4124-4132. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2969-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
In making decisions, we often choose from among options with multiple value-relevant attributes. Neuroeconomic models propose that the value associated with each attribute is integrated in a global value for each option. However, some evidence from patients with ventromedial frontal lobe (VMF) damage argues against a very general role for this region in value integration, suggesting instead that it contributes critically to a specific value inference or comparison process. Here, we tested value-based decision-making involving artificial multiattribute objects in humans with focal damage to the VMF ( = 12) compared with a healthy group matched for age and education ( = 24) and with a group with frontal lobe damage sparing the VMF ( = 12). In a "configural" condition, overall object value was predicted by the conjunction of two attributes, while in an "elemental" condition, object value could be assessed by combining the independent values of individual attributes. Patients with VMF damage were impaired in making choices when value was uniquely predicted by the configuration of attributes, but intact when choosing based on elemental attribute values. This is evidence that the VMF is critical for inferring the value of whole objects in a multiattribute choice. These findings have implications for models of value-based choice and add to emerging views of how this region may interact with medial temporal lobe systems involved in configural object processing and relational memory. Neuroeconomic models propose that the ventromedial frontal lobe (VMF) supports multiattribute decisions by integrating the values of attributes. However, researchers have been uncertain about the underlying mechanisms for this process. Patients with VMF damage made multiattribute choices under two conditions: in one, attribute values could be summed to guide choice; in the other, value was predicted by the conjunction of attributes. VMF damage impaired only the latter. This argues that the VMF is critical for inferring value from configural information to guide multiattribute object choice. This region may be key for judging the emergent "value of the forest," rather than for integrating the individual "value of each tree."
在做决策时,我们通常会在具有多个与价值相关属性的选项中进行选择。神经经济学模型提出,每个属性的价值在每个选项的整体价值中得到整合。然而,一些来自腹内侧前额叶(VMF)损伤患者的证据表明,该区域在价值整合中并非起着非常普遍的作用,而是相反,它对特定的价值推断或比较过程至关重要。在这里,我们测试了在 VMF 局灶性损伤患者(n = 12)、健康对照组(n = 24)和额叶损伤但保留 VMF 患者(n = 12)中,涉及人工多属性对象的基于价值的决策。在“组合”条件下,整体对象价值由两个属性的结合来预测,而在“元素”条件下,对象价值可以通过组合各个属性的独立值来评估。当价值仅由属性的组合来预测时,VMF 损伤患者在做出选择时受损,但当基于元素属性值做出选择时则完好无损。这表明 VMF 对于在多属性选择中推断整体对象的价值至关重要。这些发现对基于价值的选择模型具有启示意义,并增加了对该区域如何与内侧颞叶系统相互作用的新认识,这些系统涉及到组合对象处理和关系记忆。神经经济学模型提出,腹内侧前额叶(VMF)通过整合属性的价值来支持多属性决策。然而,研究人员对于这一过程的潜在机制仍存在不确定性。VMF 损伤患者在两种条件下进行多属性选择:一种条件下,属性值可以相加来指导选择;另一种条件下,价值由属性的结合来预测。VMF 损伤仅损害了后者。这表明 VMF 对于从组合信息中推断价值以指导多属性对象选择至关重要。该区域可能是判断“森林的整体价值”的关键,而不是整合“每棵树的个体价值”。