Suppr超能文献

使用 DEMQOL 和 DEMQOL-Proxy 估计痴呆症的偏好单指数测量。

Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy.

机构信息

Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):346-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.016. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although condition-specific measures are commonly used in dementia, they cannot be used in analyses of cost per quality-adjusted life-year because they do not incorporate preferences. We addressed this gap by estimating two preference-based single index measures: the DEMQOL-U from the self-report DEMQOL (mild-to-moderate dementia severity) and the DEMQOL-Proxy-U from the carer-report DEMQOL-Proxy (all levels of dementia severity).

METHODS

We conducted valuation studies on 593 members of the general population (306 for the DEMQOL-U, 287 for the DEMQOL-Proxy-U) using the time trade-off elicitation technique. We then fitted a range of mean and individual-level multivariate regression models to the valuation data to derive preference weights for each measure. We applied the estimated weights to a large, clinically representative sample.

RESULTS

Mean observed time trade-off values ranged from 0.18 to 0.95 for DEMQOL-U and from 0.33 to 0.96 for DEMQOL-Proxy-U. The best performing models for each measure were main effects models estimated using individual-level data. DEMQOL-Proxy-U had inconsistent but insignificant coefficient estimates for one dimension. Models were estimated to remove these inconsistencies.

CONCLUSION

Preference-based single index measures from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy for use in economic evaluation will enable economic evaluation using quality-adjusted life-years to be undertaken for people across the full range of dementia severity. Future research will examine how the utilities from each measure can be used and combined to populate cost-effectiveness models.

摘要

目的

尽管特定于疾病的指标常用于痴呆症,但它们不能用于成本效益分析,因为它们不包含偏好。我们通过估计两种基于偏好的单一指标测量来解决这一差距:来自自我报告的 DEMQOL 的 DEMQOL-U(轻度至中度痴呆严重程度)和来自照顾者报告的 DEMQOL-Proxy 的 DEMQOL-Proxy-U(所有痴呆严重程度水平)。

方法

我们使用时间权衡 elicitation 技术对 593 名普通人群成员(306 名用于 DEMQOL-U,287 名用于 DEMQOL-Proxy-U)进行了估值研究。然后,我们使用一系列均值和个体水平的多元回归模型对估值数据进行拟合,为每个指标得出偏好权重。我们将估计的权重应用于一个大型的、具有临床代表性的样本。

结果

对于 DEMQOL-U,观察到的平均时间权衡值范围为 0.18 至 0.95,对于 DEMQOL-Proxy-U,范围为 0.33 至 0.96。每个指标的最佳表现模型都是使用个体水平数据估计的主效应模型。DEMQOL-Proxy-U 有一个维度的系数估计不一致但不显著。模型被估计以消除这些不一致性。

结论

DEMQOL 和 DEMQOL-Proxy 的基于偏好的单一指标测量可用于经济评估,这将使使用质量调整生命年来对各种痴呆严重程度的人群进行经济评估成为可能。未来的研究将研究如何使用和组合每个指标的效用来填充成本效益模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验