Suppr超能文献

接受或未接受新辅助放化疗的转移性直肠癌患者的肿瘤学结局比较。

Comparison of oncologic outcomes of metastatic rectal cancer patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

作者信息

Kim So Hyun, Kim Jae Hwang, Jung Sang Hun

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, South Korea,

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;30(9):1193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2272-0. Epub 2015 Jun 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stage IV rectal cancer.

METHODS

Primary rectal cancer patients with synchronous distant metastases between September 2001 and August 2011 were enrolled. Of 86 patients, 40 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (RTX group) and the remaining 46 patients underwent postoperative systemic chemotherapy without radiotherapy (NRTX group). Sharp mesorectal excision according to tumor location was performed. Oncologic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The lower tumor location was more common in RTX group than NRTX group (60.0 vs. 28.3%, P = 0.003). Clinical T and N status and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score were similar in both groups. The incidence of pathologic LN metastases in the NRTX group was 93.5% compared with 70.0% in RTX group (P = 0.007). Pattern of distant metastasis was similar between groups. However, metastatectomy was frequently performed in RTX group than NRTX group (57.5 vs. 30.4%, P = 0.020). There was no statistical difference in local recurrence rate between groups (10.0% in RTX vs. 15.2% in NRTX, P = 0.470). The median PFS was similar in both groups (12.00 months in RTX vs. 12.00 months in NRTX, P = 0.768). The median OS between groups was also not different (24.00 months in RTX vs. 27.00 months in NRT, P = 0.510).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may not affect local control and overall survival in locally advanced rectal cancer with distant metastasis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估新辅助放化疗对IV期直肠癌的疗效。

方法

纳入2001年9月至2011年8月期间出现同步远处转移的原发性直肠癌患者。86例患者中,40例接受新辅助放化疗(放疗组),其余46例接受术后全身化疗但未接受放疗(非放疗组)。根据肿瘤位置进行锐性直肠系膜切除术。比较肿瘤学结局。

结果

放疗组肿瘤位置较低的情况比非放疗组更常见(60.0%对28.3%,P = 0.003)。两组的临床T和N分期以及美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分相似。非放疗组病理淋巴结转移发生率为93.5%,而放疗组为70.0%(P = 0.007)。两组远处转移模式相似。然而,放疗组比非放疗组更频繁地进行转移灶切除术(57.5%对30.4%,P = 0.020)。两组局部复发率无统计学差异(放疗组为10.0%,非放疗组为15.2%,P = 0.470)。两组的中位无进展生存期相似(放疗组为12.00个月,非放疗组为12.00个月,P = 0.768)。两组的中位总生存期也无差异(放疗组为24.00个月,非放疗组为27.00个月,P = 0.510)。

结论

新辅助放化疗可能不会影响伴有远处转移的局部晚期直肠癌的局部控制和总生存期。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验