Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者不使用胰岛素时的自我血糖监测——指南是否有证据支持?

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with diabetes who do not use insulin--are guidelines evidence-based?

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2012 Oct;29(10):1226-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03659.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate if clinical practice guideline recommendations regarding self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with diabetes not using insulin follow the principles of evidence-based medicine.

METHODS

After a search from 1999 to 2011, 18 clinical practice guidelines were included. Recommendations regarding self-monitoring of blood glucose were graded on a scale from one (strongly against self-monitoring) to four (strongly in favour of self-monitoring) and compared with the similarly graded conclusions of systematic reviews that were cited by the clinical practice guidelines. We also investigated how clinical practice guideline characteristics, for example funding sources, and quality of references cited could be related to the guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The clinical practice guidelines cited in total 15 systematic reviews, 14 randomized controlled trials, 33 non-randomized controlled trials papers and 18 clinical practice guidelines or position statements. The clinical practice guideline recommendations had an average grade of 3.4 (range 2.0-4.0). Higher grades were seen for clinical practice guidelines that acknowledged industry funding (mean value 4.0) or were issued by organizations depending on private funding (mean value 3.6 vs. 3.0 for governmental funding). The conclusions of the 15 systematic reviews had a mean grade of 2.2 (range 1.0-3.8). Systematic reviews with low grades were less cited. In total, 21 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic reviews. Approximately half of these evaluated an educational intervention where the effect of self-monitoring of blood glucose could not be clearly isolated.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical practice guidelines were more in favour of self-monitoring use than the systematic reviews that were cited. The citation practice was non-systematic and industry funding seemingly led to a more positive attitude towards use of self-monitoring of blood glucose.

摘要

目的

评估针对未使用胰岛素的糖尿病患者自我血糖监测的临床实践指南建议是否遵循循证医学原则。

方法

从 1999 年到 2011 年进行搜索后,纳入了 18 项临床实践指南。自我血糖监测的建议根据等级从 1(强烈反对自我监测)到 4(强烈赞成自我监测)进行分级,并与临床实践指南引用的经过类似分级的系统评价的结论进行比较。我们还研究了临床实践指南的特征(例如资金来源)和引用参考文献的质量如何与指南建议相关。

结果

临床实践指南共引用了 15 项系统评价、14 项随机对照试验、33 项非随机对照试验论文和 18 项临床实践指南或立场声明。临床实践指南建议的平均等级为 3.4(范围 2.0-4.0)。对于承认产业资助的临床实践指南(平均值为 4.0)或由依赖私人资金的组织发布的临床实践指南(平均值为 3.6 比政府资助的 3.0),等级较高。15 项系统评价的结论平均等级为 2.2(范围 1.0-3.8)。等级较低的系统评价引用较少。在总共纳入的 21 项随机对照试验中,大约一半评估了教育干预,其中自我血糖监测的效果无法明确分离。

结论

临床实践指南比被引用的系统评价更赞成自我监测的使用。引用实践是非系统性的,产业资助似乎导致了对自我血糖监测使用的更积极态度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验