Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):176-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0831.
Given the importance of glycemic control in the development of diabetes complications, the plethora of tools now available to monitor the day-to-day trends in glycemia is remarkable. In this regard, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered a key component of patient management. Arguably, there remains almost universal agreement that SMBG should be available to all diabetic patients regardless of current treatment strategy. However, recently there have been reports that have challenged the current paradigm that all patients should use SMBG and concluded that SMBG for type 2 diabetic patients not on insulin may not be beneficial on glycemic control and must be weighed against the expense and inconvenience. In this two-part point-counterpoint narrative, Malanda et al. and Polonsky and Fisher take opposing views on the utility of SMBG to be valuable for individuals with type 2 diabetes not using insulin. In the narrative below, Malanda et al. suggest that the evidence for potentially beneficial SMBG-induced effects on glycemic control, hypoglycemic periods, and potential harms in type 2 diabetic patients who are not treated with insulin does not justify the use of SMBG. Moreover, the use of SMBG is associated with huge costs, which should be better redirected to effective strategies to improve health for this category of patients. -William T. Cefalu, MD Editor in Chief, Diabetes Care.
鉴于血糖控制对于糖尿病并发症发展的重要性,目前有大量可用于监测日常血糖趋势的工具,这令人瞩目。在这方面,自我血糖监测(SMBG)已被认为是患者管理的关键组成部分。可以说,几乎所有人都认为,无论当前的治疗策略如何,所有糖尿病患者都应该能够进行 SMBG。然而,最近有报道质疑当前的模式,即所有患者都应该使用 SMBG,并得出结论认为,对于未使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者,SMBG 可能对血糖控制无益,必须权衡其费用和不便。在这篇正反双方观点的叙述性文章中,Malanda 等人和 Polonsky 和 Fisher 对 2 型糖尿病患者使用 SMBG 的价值持相反观点,这些患者未使用胰岛素。在下面的叙述中,Malanda 等人认为,对于未接受胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者,SMBG 可能对血糖控制、低血糖期和潜在危害产生有益影响的证据不足以证明 SMBG 的使用是合理的。此外,SMBG 的使用与巨大的成本相关,这些成本应该更好地用于改善这一类患者健康的有效策略。-William T. Cefalu,医学博士,《糖尿病护理》主编。