• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于宗教信仰的惩教项目能起作用吗?明尼苏达州“内心转变自由倡议”的成果评估。

Can faith-based correctional programs work? An outcome evaluation of the innerchange freedom initiative in Minnesota.

作者信息

Duwe Grant, King Michelle

机构信息

Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul, MN 55108-5219, USA.

出版信息

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Jul;57(7):813-41. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12439397. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1177/0306624X12439397
PMID:22436731
Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the InnerChange Freedom Initiative (InnerChange), a faith-based prisoner reentry program, by examining recidivism outcomes among 732 offenders released from Minnesota prisons between 2003 and 2009. Results from the Cox regression analyses revealed that participating in InnerChange significantly reduced reoffending (rearrest, reconviction, and new offense reincarceration), although it did not have a significant impact on reincarceration for a technical violation revocation. The findings further suggest that the beneficial recidivism outcomes for InnerChange participants may have been due, in part, to the continuum of mentoring support some offenders received in the institution and the community. The results imply that faith-based correctional programs can reduce recidivism, but only if they apply evidence-based practices that focus on providing a behavioral intervention within a therapeutic community, addressing the criminogenic needs of participants and delivering a continuum of care from the institution to the community. Given that InnerChange relies heavily on volunteers and program costs are privately funded, the program exacts no additional costs to the State of Minnesota. Yet, because InnerChange lowers recidivism, which includes reduced reincarceration and victimization costs, the program may be especially advantageous from a cost-benefit perspective.

摘要

本研究通过考察2003年至2009年间从明尼苏达州监狱释放的732名罪犯的累犯结果,评估了基于信仰的囚犯重新融入计划“内心转变自由倡议”(InnerChange)的有效性。Cox回归分析结果显示,参与“内心转变自由倡议”显著减少了再次犯罪(再次被捕、再次定罪和新罪行再次入狱),尽管它对因技术性违规撤销缓刑而再次入狱没有显著影响。研究结果进一步表明,“内心转变自由倡议”参与者有益的累犯结果可能部分归因于一些罪犯在监狱和社区中获得的持续指导支持。结果表明,基于信仰的惩教计划可以减少累犯,但前提是它们应用基于证据的做法,重点是在治疗性社区内提供行为干预,满足参与者的犯罪成因需求,并从监狱到社区提供持续的护理。鉴于“内心转变自由倡议”严重依赖志愿者且项目成本由私人资助,该项目不会给明尼苏达州带来额外成本。然而,由于“内心转变自由倡议”降低了累犯率,包括减少了再次入狱和受害成本,从成本效益角度来看,该项目可能特别有利。

相似文献

1
Can faith-based correctional programs work? An outcome evaluation of the innerchange freedom initiative in Minnesota.基于宗教信仰的惩教项目能起作用吗?明尼苏达州“内心转变自由倡议”的成果评估。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Jul;57(7):813-41. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12439397. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
2
An outcome evaluation of a prison-based life-skills program: the power of people.一项基于监狱的生活技能项目的成果评估:人的力量。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Apr;59(4):384-405. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13509444. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
3
The impact of prison-based treatment on sex offender recidivism: evidence from Minnesota.基于监狱的治疗对性犯罪者再犯的影响:来自明尼苏达州的证据。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Sep;21(3):279-307. doi: 10.1177/1079063209338490. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
4
Recidivism among participants of an employment assistance program for prisoners and offenders.针对囚犯和罪犯的就业援助项目参与者的累犯情况。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2014 Mar;58(3):348-63. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12470526. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
5
Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota.支持和问责制圈(COSA)在美国可行吗?明尼苏达州随机试验的初步结果。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Apr;25(2):143-65. doi: 10.1177/1079063212453942. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
6
Reentry Programs for Adult Male Offender Recidivism and Reintegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成年男性罪犯再犯与重新融入的重返社会计划:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(14):4655-4676. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18778448. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
The impact of prison reentry services on short-term outcomes: evidence from a multisite evaluation.重返监狱服务对短期结果的影响:来自多地点评估的证据。
Eval Rev. 2013 Jun-Aug;37(3-4):274-313. doi: 10.1177/0193841X13519105. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
8
Effectiveness of a Prison-Based Treatment Program for Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Criminal Recidivism.一项针对亲密伴侣暴力男性施暴者的监狱治疗项目的效果:一项关于刑事累犯的准实验研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):10405-10430. doi: 10.1177/0886260519885641. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
The Importance of Positive Social Support During Reentry From Prison: Examining the Role of Volunteer Mentoring.出狱后积极社会支持的重要性:审视志愿指导的作用。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023 Apr;67(5):567-587. doi: 10.1177/0306624X211059316. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
10
Evaluating Restorative Justice Circles of Support and Accountability: Can Social Support Overcome Structural Barriers?评估恢复性司法支持与问责圈:社会支持能否克服结构性障碍?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Feb;62(3):739-758. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16652627. Epub 2016 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A mixed methods evaluation of well-being among incarcerated religious education participants in the United States.对美国被监禁的宗教教育参与者的幸福感进行的混合方法评估。
Health Justice. 2025 May 13;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00340-w.
2
The effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention for forensic psychiatric outpatients: results of a randomized controlled trial.一种针对法医精神病门诊患者的附加非正式社交网络干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:1129492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129492. eCollection 2023.
3
Patients' and volunteer coaches' experiences with an informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric care: a qualitative analysis.
患者和志愿者教练在法医精神病学护理中非正式社交网络干预的体验:定性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04594-2.
4
Religious Involvement, Moral Community and Social Ecology: New Considerations in the Study of Religion and Reentry.宗教参与、道德共同体与社会生态:宗教与重新融入研究中的新思考
J Quant Criminol. 2019 Sep;35(3):493-516. doi: 10.1007/s10940-018-9394-9. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Reentry interventions that address substance use: A systematic review.再入干预措施解决药物使用问题:系统评价。
Psychol Serv. 2020 Feb;17(1):93-101. doi: 10.1037/ser0000293. Epub 2018 Oct 11.