Berghuis Maria
1 Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(14):4655-4676. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18778448. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of reentry programs designed to reduce recidivism and ensure successful reintegration among adult, male offenders. Studies were included if they (a) evaluated a reentry program incorporating elements dealing with the transition from prison to community for adult, male offenders; (b) utilized a randomized controlled design; and (c) measured recidivism as a primary outcome. In addition, secondary outcomes measures of reintegration were also included. The systematic search of 8,179 titles revealed nine randomized controlled evaluations that fulfilled eligibility criteria. The random-effects meta-analysis for rearrest revealed a statistically nonsignificant effect favoring the intervention (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.74, 1.07]). Similar results were found for reconviction (OR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.77, 1.12]) and reincarceration (OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.78, 1.05]). Studies reported mixed results of secondary outcomes of reintegration. The results of this review reflect the variability of findings on reducing recidivism. The challenges faced in conducting this review highlight a need for further research and theory development around reentry programs.
本综述的目的是评估旨在减少累犯并确保成年男性罪犯成功重新融入社会的重返社会计划的有效性。如果研究符合以下条件,则纳入研究:(a)评估一项针对成年男性罪犯的重返社会计划,该计划包含处理从监狱到社区过渡的要素;(b)采用随机对照设计;(c)将累犯作为主要结果进行测量。此外,还纳入了重新融入社会的次要结果指标。对8179篇文献的系统检索发现了9项符合纳入标准的随机对照评估。对再次被捕的随机效应荟萃分析显示,有利于干预措施的效应在统计学上不显著(优势比[OR]=0.89,95%置信区间[CI][0.74,1.07])。在再次定罪(OR=0.94,95%CI[0.77,1.12])和再次入狱(OR=0.90,95%CI[0.78,1.05])方面也发现了类似结果。研究报告了重新融入社会次要结果的混合结果。本综述的结果反映了在减少累犯方面研究结果的变异性。进行本综述所面临的挑战凸显了围绕重返社会计划开展进一步研究和理论发展的必要性。