Bruno N, Bertamini M
University of Padua, Italy.
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Oct;48(4):331-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03206684.
Surface contours specified by occlusion events that varied in density, velocity, and type of motion (rotation or translation) were examined in four experiments. As a fourth experimental factor, there were both figure-motion trials (the occluding surface moved over a stationary background) and background-motion trials (the background moved behind a stationary surface) in each experiment. Displays contained line patterns and rotary motion (Experiment 1), line patterns and translatory motion (Experiment 2), textured surfaces and rotary motion (Experiment 3), and textured surfaces and translatory motion (Experiment 4). Results indicate that contour identifications are more accurate with translation than with rotation, and that background-motion trials are generally easier than figure-motion trials. Although density in all experiments affected identifications in both background- and figure-motion trials, velocity did so in Experiment 4 only. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, velocity affected identifications in background-motion trials but not in figure-motion trials. In Experiments 3 and 4, the rate of accretion and deletion of texture was a poor predictor of identification accuracy. These results are not consistent with previous accounts of contour perception from occlusion events, and may reflect an involvement of ocular pursuit as a mechanism for registering contour information.
在四项实验中,研究了由密度、速度和运动类型(旋转或平移)各不相同的遮挡事件所指定的表面轮廓。作为第四个实验因素,在每个实验中既有图形运动试验(遮挡表面在静止背景上移动),也有背景运动试验(背景在静止表面后移动)。展示内容包括线条图案和旋转运动(实验1)、线条图案和平移运动(实验2)、有纹理的表面和旋转运动(实验3)以及有纹理的表面和平移运动(实验4)。结果表明,平移时的轮廓识别比旋转时更准确,并且背景运动试验通常比图形运动试验更容易。虽然所有实验中的密度都影响了背景运动和图形运动试验中的识别,但速度仅在实验4中产生了影响。在实验1、2和3中,速度影响了背景运动试验中的识别,但未影响图形运动试验中的识别。在实验3和4中,纹理的增加和删除速率并不能很好地预测识别准确性。这些结果与先前关于遮挡事件中轮廓感知的描述不一致,可能反映了眼球追踪作为一种记录轮廓信息机制的参与情况。