Suppr超能文献

CT 结肠成像与结肠镜检查相比在患者接受度和心理影响方面的比较:来自症状患者的多中心随机对照试验的结果。

Patient acceptability and psychologic consequences of CT colonography compared with those of colonoscopy: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, University College Hospital, Level 2, Podium, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, England.

出版信息

Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):723-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111523. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To use a randomized design to compare patients' short- and longer-term experiences after computed tomographic (CT) colonography or colonoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After ethical approval, the trial was registered. Patients gave written informed consent. Five hundred forty-seven patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer who had been randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1 to undergo either colonoscopy (n = 362) or CT colonography (n = 185) received a validated questionnaire to assess immediate test experience (including satisfaction, worry, discomfort, adverse effects) and a 3-month questionnaire to assess psychologic outcomes (including satisfaction with result dissemination and reassurance). Data were analyzed by using Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and χ(2) test statistics.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy were less satisfied than those undergoing CT colonography (median score of 61 and interquartile range [IQR] of 55-67 vs median score of 64 and IQR of 58-70, respectively; P = .008) and significantly more worried (median score of 16 [IQR, 12-21] vs 15 [IQR, 9-19], P = .007); they also experienced more physical discomfort (median score of 39 [IQR, 29-51] vs 35 [IQR, 24-44]) and more adverse events (82 of 246 vs 28 of 122 reported feeling faint or dizzy, P = .039). However, at 3 months, they were more satisfied with how results were received (median score of 4 [IQR, 3-4] vs 3 [IQR, 3-3], P < .0005) and less likely to require follow-up colonic investigations (17 of 230 vs 37 of 107, P < .0005). No differences were observed between the tests regarding 3-month psychologic consequences of the diagnostic episode, except for a trend toward a difference (P = .050) in negative affect (unpleasant emotions such as distress), with patients undergoing CT colonography reporting less intense negative affect.

CONCLUSION

CT colonography has superior patient acceptability compared with colonoscopy in the short term, but colonoscopy offers some benefits to patients that become apparent after longer-term follow-up. The respective advantages of each test should be balanced when referring symptomatic patients.

摘要

目的

采用随机设计比较 CT 结肠成像与结肠镜检查后患者的短期和长期体验。

材料与方法

本试验经伦理批准后进行注册,并获得患者书面知情同意。将 547 例有结直肠癌症状提示的患者随机分为两组,2:1 行结肠镜检查(n = 362)或 CT 结肠成像(n = 185),两组患者均接受一份有效调查问卷,以评估即刻检查体验(包括满意度、担忧、不适、不良反应),以及 3 个月时的调查问卷以评估心理结局(包括对结果传播和保证的满意度)。采用 Mann-Whitney U、Kruskal-Wallis 和 χ(2)检验统计方法进行数据分析。

结果

与 CT 结肠成像相比,行结肠镜检查的患者满意度较低(评分中位数分别为 61 和四分位距 [IQR] 55-67 与评分中位数为 64 和 IQR 58-70,P =.008),担忧程度显著较高(评分中位数分别为 16 [IQR,12-21] 与 15 [IQR,9-19],P =.007);身体不适程度也较高(评分中位数分别为 39 [IQR,29-51] 与 35 [IQR,24-44]),不良反应发生率也较高(246 例中有 82 例自述头晕或眩晕,122 例中有 28 例,P =.039)。然而,3 个月时,患者对检查结果的接受程度更高(评分中位数分别为 4 [IQR,3-4] 与 3 [IQR,3-3],P <.0005),更不可能需要进行后续结肠检查(230 例中有 17 例,107 例中有 37 例,P <.0005)。除负面情绪(痛苦等不愉快的情绪)方面有差异的趋势(P =.050)外,两种检查方法在诊断后 3 个月的心理后果方面无差异,而 CT 结肠成像患者报告的负面情绪强度较低。

结论

与结肠镜相比,CT 结肠成像在短期内更受患者接受,但结肠镜在长期随访中为患者带来一些益处。在为有症状的患者提供建议时,应权衡两种检查方法的各自优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验