• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价布比卡因与芬太尼或吗啡治疗慢性中重度疼痛患者的疗效和安全性。

Systematic review of efficacy and safety of buprenorphine versus fentanyl or morphine in patients with chronic moderate to severe pain.

机构信息

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):833-45. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.678938. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1185/03007995.2012.678938
PMID:22443154
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess efficacy and safety of buprenorphine patch versus fentanyl patch in patients with chronic moderate to severe pain.

METHODS

Fifteen databases were searched up to December 2010. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials assessing the efficacy in patients with chronic pain were included. Quantitative methods for data synthesis were used and two network meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Fourteen unique trials (17 publications) were included. No head-to-head randomised trials of buprenorphine patch compared with fentanyl patch were identified. Therefore, less robust evidence from indirect comparisons was used. Results from a network meta-analysis of non-enriched designs (eight trials), using trials versus placebo and trials versus morphine for indirect comparisons, indicated that transdermal fentanyl, in comparison with transdermal buprenorphine, showed significantly more nausea (odds ratio [OR] 4.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 20.39), a significantly higher number of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (OR 5.94, 95% CI 1.78 to 19.87), and non-significant differences on all other outcomes, including pain measures. In comparison with morphine, transdermal buprenorphine had a significantly higher decrease of pain intensity (MD [mean difference] -16.20, 95% CI -28.92 to -3.48) while morphine caused more cases of constipation (OR 7.50, 95% CI 1.45 to 38.85) and a significantly higher number of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (OR 5.80, 95% CI 1.68 to 20.11). All other outcomes showed non-significant differences between transdermal buprenorphine and morphine. The results were similar when also including six trials using enriched designs with the exception of more cases of vomiting for fentanyl (OR 17.32, 95% CI 4.43 to 67.71) and morphine (OR 15.85, 95% CI 3.92 to 64.13) compared to buprenorphine.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate comparability of transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for pain measures with significantly fewer adverse events (nausea and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events) caused by transdermal buprenorphine.

摘要

目的

系统评估丁丙诺啡贴剂与芬太尼贴剂治疗慢性中重度疼痛患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了截至 2010 年 12 月的 15 个数据库。纳入了评估慢性疼痛患者疗效的随机和半随机试验。采用定量方法进行数据综合,并进行了两项网络荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 14 项独特的试验(17 篇文献)。未发现丁丙诺啡贴剂与芬太尼贴剂的头对头随机试验。因此,使用间接比较的证据质量较低。使用试验与安慰剂和试验与吗啡进行间接比较的非富集设计的网络荟萃分析结果表明,与丁丙诺啡相比,透皮芬太尼导致恶心的发生率显著更高(比值比 [OR] 4.66,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.07 至 20.39),因不良事件导致的治疗中止率显著更高(OR 5.94,95% CI 1.78 至 19.87),所有其他结局,包括疼痛测量值,均无显著差异。与吗啡相比,丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂可显著降低疼痛强度(MD [平均差值] -16.20,95% CI -28.92 至 -3.48),而吗啡导致更多的便秘病例(OR 7.50,95% CI 1.45 至 38.85)和更高的因不良事件导致的治疗中止率(OR 5.80,95% CI 1.68 至 20.11)。丁丙诺啡和吗啡之间的所有其他结局均无显著差异。纳入 6 项使用富集设计的试验后,结果也相似,除芬太尼(OR 17.32,95% CI 4.43 至 67.71)和吗啡(OR 15.85,95% CI 3.92 至 64.13)的呕吐病例数增加外。

结论

研究结果表明,丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂与芬太尼透皮贴剂在疼痛测量方面具有可比性,丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂引起的不良反应(恶心和因不良反应导致的治疗中止)明显更少。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of efficacy and safety of buprenorphine versus fentanyl or morphine in patients with chronic moderate to severe pain.系统评价布比卡因与芬太尼或吗啡治疗慢性中重度疼痛患者的疗效和安全性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):833-45. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.678938. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
2
Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews.用于癌症疼痛的阿片类药物——Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD012592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012592.pub2.
3
Oxycodone for cancer-related pain.羟考酮用于癌症相关疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD003870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003870.pub6.
4
Oxycodone for cancer-related pain.羟考酮治疗癌性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):CD003870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003870.pub7.
5
Hydromorphone for cancer pain.氢吗啡酮用于癌症疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;10(10):CD011108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011108.pub2.
6
Adverse effects of transdermal opiates treating moderate-severe cancer pain in comparison to long-acting morphine: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.与长效吗啡相比,经皮阿片类药物治疗中重度癌痛的不良反应:一项荟萃分析及文献系统综述
J Palliat Med. 2008 Apr;11(3):492-501. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0200.
7
Systematic review of tapentadol in chronic severe pain.塞来昔布治疗慢性中重度癌痛的系统评价
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1907-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.611494. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Hydromorphone for cancer pain.氢吗啡酮治疗癌痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):CD011108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011108.pub3.
10
Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.阿片类药物长期用于慢性非癌性疼痛的相关不良事件:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012509.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer pain: molecular mechanisms and management.癌症疼痛:分子机制与管理
Mol Biomed. 2025 Jun 28;6(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s43556-025-00289-0.
2
Strategy for effective analgesia with intravenous buprenorphine in patients with acute postoperative pain.急性术后疼痛患者静脉注射丁丙诺啡的有效镇痛策略。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03084-0.
3
Expecting medication misuse: a proactive approach to drug discovery to prevent fatal overdose.预期药物滥用:预防致命过量用药的药物发现主动方法。
Future Med Chem. 2025 Mar;17(6):681-692. doi: 10.1080/17568919.2025.2476388. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Significance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer.非甾体抗炎药在宫颈癌预防和治疗中的意义。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 16;11(3):e42055. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42055. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
5
Buprenorphine Pharmacodynamics: A Bridge to Understanding Buprenorphine Clinical Benefits.丁丙诺啡的药效学:理解丁丙诺啡临床益处的桥梁。
Drugs. 2025 Feb;85(2):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02128-y. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
6
The impact of opioid administration on the incidence of postanaesthetic colic in horses.阿片类药物给药对马麻醉后绞痛发生率的影响。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 19;5:1347548. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1347548. eCollection 2024.
7
The Use of Transdermal Buprenorphine for Acute Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Case Report.透皮丁丙诺啡用于急性带状疱疹后神经痛:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Feb 12;15(2):e34886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34886. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Triglyceride-Mimetic Prodrugs of Buprenorphine Enhance Oral Bioavailability via Promotion of Lymphatic Transport.丁丙诺啡的甘油三酯模拟前药通过促进淋巴转运提高口服生物利用度。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 12;13:879660. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.879660. eCollection 2022.
9
Long-Lasting Analgesia With Transdermal Fentanyl: A New Approach in Rat Neonatal Research.透皮芬太尼的长效镇痛:大鼠新生儿研究中的一种新方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 17;13:798011. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.798011. eCollection 2022.
10
Opioids in cancer: The κ‑opioid receptor (Review).阿片类药物在癌症中的作用:κ 阿片受体(综述)。
Mol Med Rep. 2022 Feb;25(2). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12560. Epub 2021 Dec 8.