González-García Lorena, Chemello Clarice, García-Sánchez Filomena, Serpa-Anaya Delia C, Gómez-González Carmen, Soriano-Carrascosa Leticia, Muñoz-de Rueda Paloma, Moya-Molina Miguel, Sánchez-García Fernando, Ortega-Calvo Manuel
Grupo de Investigación en Atención Farmacéutica, University of Granada, FISEVI, Spain.
Int J Prev Med. 2012 Mar;3(3):197-210.
Bearing in mind the philosophical pedagogical significance of short phrases for the training of researchers in the health care ambit, we hence have studied the aphorisms and striking phrases expressed during the epidemiology course at the Andalusian School of Public Health.
Belonging to the qualitative type and applied through the establishment of a multidisciplinary focus group made up of ten post-graduated students, where one of them acted as a moderator. The collection of information lasted four months. Information was classified in two ways: Firstly, aphorisms and short phrases with a pedagogical impact; and secondly, data with statistical, epidemiological, epistemological, pragmatic, or heuristic component, and for scientific diffusion. It was decided to perform a triangulation that included a descriptive presentation and a basic categorical analysis. The two teachers with a highest interpretative load have been identified .
A total of 127 elements, regarded as of interest by the focus group, were collected. Forty-four of them (34.6%) were aphorisms, and 83 were short phrases with a pedagogical load (65.3%). Most of all them were classified as statistical elements (35.4%) followed by epistemological (21.3%) and epidemiological (15.7%) elements. There was no tendency towards aphorisms or short phrases (P > 0.05) among the teachers with more informative representation.
There has been a tilt in the contents towards the statistical area to the detriment of the epidemiological one. Concept maps have visualized classifications. This sort of qualitative analysis helps the researcher review contents acquired during his/her training process.
考虑到简短语句在医疗保健领域研究人员培训中的哲学教学意义,我们因此研究了安达卢西亚公共卫生学院流行病学课程中所表达的格言和醒目语句。
属于定性类型,通过组建一个由十名研究生组成的多学科焦点小组来应用,其中一人担任主持人。信息收集持续了四个月。信息以两种方式分类:第一,具有教学影响的格言和简短语句;第二,具有统计、流行病学、认识论、实用或启发式成分以及用于科学传播的数据。决定进行包括描述性呈现和基本分类分析的三角测量。确定了两位具有最高解释负荷的教师。
总共收集了127个焦点小组认为有意义的元素。其中44个(34.6%)是格言,83个是具有教学负荷的简短语句(65.3%)。其中大多数被归类为统计元素(35.4%),其次是认识论元素(21.3%)和流行病学元素(15.7%)。在具有更多信息代表性的教师中,格言或简短语句没有明显倾向(P>0.05)。
内容倾向于统计领域,对流行病学领域不利。概念图使分类可视化。这种定性分析有助于研究人员回顾其培训过程中获得的内容。