Organization and Management Studies, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, USA.
Acad Med. 2012 May;87(5):574-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824d2b37.
To examine the current state of satisfaction with the academic medicine workplace among U.S. medical school faculty and the workplace factors that have the greatest influence on global satisfaction.
The authors used data from the 2009 administration of a medical school faculty job satisfaction survey and used descriptive statistics and χ analyses to assess levels of overall satisfaction within faculty subgroups. Multiple regressions used the mean scores of the 18 survey dimensions and demographic variables to predict three global satisfaction measures.
The survey was completed by 9,638 full-time faculty from 23 U.S. medical schools. Respondents were mostly satisfied on global satisfaction measures including satisfaction with their department (6,506/9,128; 71.3%) and medical school (5,796/9,124; 63.5%) and whether they would again choose to work at their medical school (5,968/8,506; 70.2%). The survey dimensions predicted global satisfaction well, with the final models explaining 51% to 67% of the variance in the dependent measures. Predictors across models include organization, governance, and transparency; focus of mission; recruitment and retention effectiveness; department relationships; workplace culture; and nature of work.
Despite the relatively unpredictable environmental challenges facing medical schools today, leaders have opportunities to influence and improve the workplace satisfaction of their faculty. Examples of opportunities include fostering a culture characterized by open communication and occasions for faculty input, and remaining vigilant regarding factors contributing to faculty burnout. Understanding what drives faculty satisfaction is crucial for medical schools as they continue to seek excellence in all missions and recruit and retain high-quality faculty.
考察美国医学院校教师对学术医学工作场所的满意度现状,以及对全球满意度影响最大的工作场所因素。
作者使用了 2009 年进行的一次医学院教师工作满意度调查的数据,采用描述性统计和 χ 分析评估教师群体内部的整体满意度水平。多元回归使用 18 项调查维度的平均分数和人口统计学变量来预测三个全球满意度衡量标准。
该调查完成于 23 所美国医学院的 9638 名全职教师。受访者在全球满意度衡量标准上大多感到满意,包括对他们所在系(6506/9128;71.3%)和医学院(5796/9124;63.5%)的满意度,以及他们是否会再次选择在他们的医学院工作(5968/8506;70.2%)。调查维度很好地预测了全球满意度,最终模型解释了因变量的 51%至 67%的方差。跨模型的预测因素包括组织、治理和透明度;使命重点;招聘和留用效果;部门关系;工作场所文化;以及工作性质。
尽管医学院目前面临着相对不可预测的环境挑战,但领导者仍有机会影响和改善教师的工作场所满意度。例如,培养一种以开放沟通和教师投入机会为特点的文化,并警惕导致教师倦怠的因素。了解是什么驱动教师满意度对医学院至关重要,因为他们继续在所有任务中追求卓越,并招聘和留住高质量的教师。