The Mind Research Network and Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM 87131-2006, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
We have previously found that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over right inferior frontal cortex (RIFC) enhances performance during learning of a difficult visual target detection task (Clark et al., 2012). In order to examine the cognitive mechanisms of tDCS that lead to enhanced performance, here we analyzed its differential effects on responses to stimuli that varied by repetition and target presence, differences related to expectancy by comparing performance in single- and double-blind task designs, and individual differences in skin stimulation and mood. Participants were trained for 1h to detect target objects hidden in a complex virtual environment, while anodal tDCS was applied over RIFC at 0.1 mA or 2.0 mA for the first 30 min. Participants were tested immediately before and after training and again 1h later. Higher tDCS current was associated with increased performance for all test stimuli, but was greatest for repeated test stimuli with the presence of hidden-targets. This finding was replicated in a second set of subjects using a double-blind task design. Accuracy for target detection discrimination sensitivity (d'; Z(hits)-Z(false alarms)) was greater for 2.0 mA current (1.77) compared with 0.1 mA (0.95), with no differences in response bias (β). Taken together, these findings indicate that the enhancement of performance with tDCS is sensitive to stimulus repetition and target presence, but not to changes in expectancy, mood, or type of blinded task design. The implications of these findings for understanding the cognitive mechanisms of tDCS are discussed.
我们之前发现,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作用于右额下回(RIFC)可以增强在困难的视觉目标检测任务学习中的表现(Clark 等人,2012)。为了研究 tDCS 增强表现的认知机制,我们在这里分析了它对刺激反应的差异影响,这些差异与通过比较单盲和双盲任务设计中的表现来比较期望的差异有关,以及皮肤刺激和情绪的个体差异。参与者接受了 1 小时的训练,以检测隐藏在复杂虚拟环境中的目标物体,同时在 RIFC 上应用 0.1 mA 或 2.0 mA 的阳极 tDCS 进行前 30 分钟。参与者在训练前、训练后和 1 小时后立即接受测试。更高的 tDCS 电流与所有测试刺激的表现提高有关,但对于重复的测试刺激和隐藏目标的存在,效果最大。这一发现通过使用双盲任务设计的第二组受试者得到了复制。目标检测判别敏感性(d';Z(命中)-Z(错误警报))对于 2.0 mA 电流(1.77)大于 0.1 mA(0.95),响应偏向(β)没有差异。总之,这些发现表明,tDCS 增强表现对刺激重复和目标存在敏感,但对期望、情绪或盲任务设计类型的变化不敏感。讨论了这些发现对理解 tDCS 的认知机制的意义。