• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理的未来:特定学科知识有多重要?与杰奎琳·福西特的对话。由珍妮·巴茨博士和凯伦·里奇博士采访。

The future of nursing: how important is discipline-specific knowledge? A conversation with Jacqueline Fawcett. Interview by Dr. Janie Butts and Dr. Karen Rich.

作者信息

Fawcett Jacqueline

机构信息

The University of Southern Mississippi, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Sci Q. 2012 Apr;25(2):151-4. doi: 10.1177/0894318412437955.

DOI:10.1177/0894318412437955
PMID:22451633
Abstract

Nurses have long attempted to secure a unique identity for the profession. Many scholars are now promoting an interdisciplinary framework for nursing practice. Fawcett is convinced that interdisciplinary practice poses a danger for nursing to lose its identity and that interdisciplinary practice cannot be successful if members of each discipline do not understand the conceptual models, practice, and research of their own discipline. Dr. Janie Butts and Dr. Karen Rich interviewed Dr. Jacqueline Fawcett about her views related to discipline-specific knowledge and nursing's future. The authors conclude that Fawcett's scientific foundation gives nursing the solidarity and power necessary to determine the unique internal goods of its practice.

摘要

长期以来,护士们一直试图为该职业确立独特的身份。现在,许多学者正在推动护理实践的跨学科框架。福西特坚信,跨学科实践对护理行业构成了失去自身身份的风险,而且,如果各学科成员不了解自己学科的概念模型、实践和研究,跨学科实践就不可能成功。珍妮·巴茨博士和凯伦·里奇博士就杰奎琳·福西特博士对特定学科知识及护理未来的观点进行了访谈。作者们得出结论,福西特的科学基础赋予了护理行业确定其独特内在价值所需的团结和力量。

相似文献

1
The future of nursing: how important is discipline-specific knowledge? A conversation with Jacqueline Fawcett. Interview by Dr. Janie Butts and Dr. Karen Rich.护理的未来:特定学科知识有多重要?与杰奎琳·福西特的对话。由珍妮·巴茨博士和凯伦·里奇博士采访。
Nurs Sci Q. 2012 Apr;25(2):151-4. doi: 10.1177/0894318412437955.
2
Re-conceptualizing the nursing metaparadigm: Articulating the philosophical ontology of the nursing discipline that orients inquiry and practice.重新构想护理元范式:阐明指导探究与实践的护理学科哲学本体论。
Nurs Inq. 2018 Jul;25(3):e12243. doi: 10.1111/nin.12243. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Influences on advancement of nursing knowledge. Interview by Jacqueline Fawcett.对护理知识发展的影响。杰奎琳·福西特访谈
Nurs Sci Q. 2005 Jul;18(3):227-32. doi: 10.1177/0894318405277523.
4
Is nursing its own worst enemy?护理是自身最大的敌人吗?
Nurs Sci Q. 2013 Jul;26(3):236-7. doi: 10.1177/0894318413489158.
5
[Considerations on the nursing discipline while approaching the year 2000].临近2000年时对护理学科的思考
Prof Inferm. 1996 Oct-Dec;49(4):39-42.
6
Nursing, healthcare, and culture: views from Canada and Taiwan for the year 2050. Interview by Jacqueline Fawcett.护理、医疗保健与文化:2050年加拿大和台湾地区的观点。杰奎琳·福西特访谈录
Nurs Sci Q. 2007 Jan;20(1):51-5. doi: 10.1177/0894318406296292.
7
Reductionism in the pursuit of nursing science: (in)congruent with nursing's core values?护理科学追求中的还原论:与护理的核心价值观(不)一致?
Can J Nurs Res. 2000 Sep;32(2):75-88.
8
A critique of Fawcett's 'Conceptual models and nursing practice: the reciprocal relationship'.对福西特《概念模型与护理实践:相互关系》的评论
J Adv Nurs. 1993 Apr;18(4):558-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18040558.x.
9
Thoughts on the discipline of nursing as we approach the year 2000.临近2000年时对护理学科的思考。
J Adv Nurs. 1990 Jul;15(7):825-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01913.x.
10
Nursing science and public health: contributions to the discipline of nursing.护理科学与公共卫生:对护理学科的贡献。
Nurs Sci Q. 2012 Jan;25(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/0894318411429034.