• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格障碍的行为遗传学:为 DSM-5 中的分类和概念化提供信息。

Behavior genetics of personality disorders: informing classification and conceptualization in DSM-5.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2013 Jul;4(3):270-83. doi: 10.1037/a0026255. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1037/a0026255
PMID:22452772
Abstract

Personality pathology is currently captured in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual through 10 categorical personality disorder (PD) diagnoses grouped into three descriptive clusters. This classification system has been criticized by many for using discrete categories and arbitrary thresholds when making clinical decisions. To address these critiques, the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group has put forth a proposal that significantly alters the structure and content of the DSM-IV PD section. If this DSM-5 Work Group has conducted its own systematic review of the empirical literature, this review has not been released or made widely available. As such, it is up to the psychology community at large to determine how well the suggested changes align with findings from extant PD research. The current article joins this effort by addressing the contribution of behavior genetic findings to the revision process for classification of PDs in DSM-5. First, we provide a brief review of the history of PD classification in the DSM. Next, we present an overview and rationale for each of the five major suggested changes to PD diagnoses. For each suggested change, we outline the available evidence from behavior genetics and interpretations of these findings. Finally, we offer a summary of considerations for PD classification as the DSM-5 moves forward. Review of the behavior genetics literature suggests that several features of the DSM-5 proposal, including the elimination of 4 PDs, merging clinical disorders and PDs on a single axis, and the implementation of a trait rating system, require significantly greater explication before a product is finalized.

摘要

人格病理学目前通过 10 种分类人格障碍(PD)诊断来描述,这些诊断分为三个描述性集群,收录在《诊断与统计手册》中。这种分类系统因其在做出临床决策时使用离散类别和任意阈值而受到许多人的批评。为了解决这些批评,DSM-5 人格和人格障碍工作组提出了一项提案,该提案极大地改变了 DSM-IV PD 部分的结构和内容。如果 DSM-5 工作组对实证文献进行了自己的系统审查,那么该审查尚未发布或广泛提供。因此,由整个心理学界决定建议的变更与现有的 PD 研究结果的契合程度。本文通过探讨行为遗传学发现对 DSM-5 中 PD 分类修订过程的贡献,加入了这一努力。首先,我们简要回顾了 DSM 中 PD 分类的历史。其次,我们概述了每个主要的 PD 诊断建议变更的要点和理由。对于每个建议的变更,我们概述了行为遗传学的可用证据,并对这些发现进行了解释。最后,我们提供了在 DSM-5 向前推进时 PD 分类的考虑因素摘要。对行为遗传学文献的回顾表明,DSM-5 提案的几个特征,包括消除 4 种 PD、将临床障碍和 PD 合并到一个单一的轴上,以及实施特质评分系统,在最终确定产品之前,需要更详细的说明。

相似文献

1
Behavior genetics of personality disorders: informing classification and conceptualization in DSM-5.人格障碍的行为遗传学:为 DSM-5 中的分类和概念化提供信息。
Personal Disord. 2013 Jul;4(3):270-83. doi: 10.1037/a0026255. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010558.pub2.
4
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
5
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Acupuncture for depression.针灸治疗抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 4;3(3):CD004046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004046.pub4.
8
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Why does perceived parenting in adolescence predict maladaptive personality in adulthood? Evidence for substantial genetic mediation.为何青少年期所感受到的养育方式能预测成年后的适应不良型人格?基因在其中起重要中介作用的证据。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Sep 19:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424001329.
2
Redefining phenotypes to advance psychiatric genetics: Implications from hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology.重新定义表型以推进精神遗传学研究:精神病理学层级分类的启示。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Feb;129(2):143-161. doi: 10.1037/abn0000486. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
Psychological Assessment with the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and Innovation.
人格障碍替代模型下的心理评估:传统与创新
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2017 Apr;48(2):79-89. doi: 10.1037/pro0000071.
4
Evidence needed to compare definitions of personality pathology: commentary on "a postmortem and future look at the personality disorders in DSM-5".需要证据来比较人格病理学的定义:评论“DSM-5 中的人格障碍的事后和未来展望”。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):388-9. doi: 10.1037/per0000049.
5
Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology.人格病理学中的自我-他人知识不对称。
J Pers. 2013 Apr;81(2):155-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00794.x.