• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 10 个欧洲临床研究基础设施网络(ECRIN)国家中,典型的研究用药品遵循相对统一的规定。

Typical investigational medicinal products follow relatively uniform regulations in 10 European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries.

机构信息

Copenhagen Trial Unit-CTU, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, and the Danish Clinical Research Infrastructures Network-DCRIN, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Mar 27;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-27.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-27
PMID:22452964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3338370/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to facilitate multinational clinical research, regulatory requirements need to become international and harmonised. The EU introduced the Directive 2001/20/EC in 2004, regulating investigational medicinal products in Europe.

METHODS

We conducted a survey in order to identify the national regulatory requirements for major categories of clinical research in ten European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries-Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom-covering approximately 70% of the EU population. Here we describe the results for regulatory requirements for typical investigational medicinal products, in the ten countries.

RESULTS

Our results show that the ten countries have fairly harmonised definitions of typical investigational medicinal products. Clinical trials assessing typical investigational medicinal products require authorisation from a national competent authority in each of the countries surveyed. The opinion of the competent authorities is communicated to the trial sponsor within the same timelines, i.e., no more than 60 days, in all ten countries. The authority to which the application has to be sent to in the different countries is not fully harmonised.

CONCLUSION

The Directive 2001/20/EC defined the term 'investigational medicinal product' and all regulatory requirements described therein are applicable to investigational medicinal products. Our survey showed, however, that those requirements had been adopted in ten European countries, not for investigational medicinal products overall, but rather a narrower category which we term 'typical' investigational medicinal products. The result is partial EU harmonisation of requirements and a relatively navigable landscape for the sponsor regarding typical investigational medicinal products.

摘要

背景

为了便于多国临床研究,监管要求需要国际化和协调一致。欧盟于 2004 年出台了指令 2001/20/EC,对欧洲的研究性药品进行监管。

方法

我们进行了一项调查,以确定欧洲十个临床研究基础设施网络(ECRIN)国家(奥地利、丹麦、法国、德国、匈牙利、爱尔兰、意大利、西班牙、瑞典和英国)的主要临床研究类别所需的国家监管要求,这些国家约占欧盟人口的 70%。在这里,我们描述了这十个国家典型研究性药品的监管要求的结果。

结果

我们的结果表明,这十个国家对典型研究性药品的定义相当协调一致。评估典型研究性药品的临床试验需要在调查的十个国家中的每个国家获得国家主管当局的授权。主管当局的意见在相同的时间内传达给试验赞助商,即在十个国家中均不超过 60 天。向不同国家发送申请的主管当局并未完全协调一致。

结论

指令 2001/20/EC 定义了“研究性药品”一词,其中所有监管要求均适用于研究性药品。然而,我们的调查显示,这些要求已在十个欧洲国家中被采纳,但并非针对所有研究性药品,而是我们称之为“典型”研究性药品的更窄类别。其结果是对要求进行了部分欧盟协调,并为赞助商提供了一个相对可导航的典型研究性药品领域。

相似文献

1
Typical investigational medicinal products follow relatively uniform regulations in 10 European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries.在 10 个欧洲临床研究基础设施网络(ECRIN)国家中,典型的研究用药品遵循相对统一的规定。
Trials. 2012 Mar 27;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-27.
2
Compassionate use of interventions: results of a European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) survey of ten European countries.干预措施的同情使用:欧洲临床研究基础设施网络(ECRIN)对十个欧洲国家的调查结果。
Trials. 2010 Nov 12;11:104. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-104.
3
Common definition for categories of clinical research: a prerequisite for a survey on regulatory requirements by the European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN).临床研究类别通用定义:欧洲临床研究基础设施网络(ECRIN)开展监管要求调查的前提条件。
Trials. 2009 Oct 16;10:95. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-95.
4
[Recording and reporting adverse reactions in clinical trials. New legal provisions according to the 12th Law Amending the German Drug Law (AMG) and the Ordinance on GCP (GCP-V)].[临床试验中的不良反应记录与报告。依据修订德国药品法(AMG)的第12条法律及药物临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)条例的新法律规定]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Feb;48(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0986-1.
5
Regulatory and operational challenges in conducting Asian International Academic Trial for expanding the indications of cancer drugs.在开展亚洲国际学术试验以扩大癌症药物适应症方面的监管和运营挑战。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May;14(3):1015-1025. doi: 10.1111/cts.12965. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Navigating the maze of requirements for obtaining approval of non-interventional studies (NIS) in the European Union.在欧盟获得非干预性研究(NIS)批准的复杂要求中摸索前行。
Ger Med Sci. 2015 Nov 17;13:Doc21. doi: 10.3205/000225. eCollection 2015.
7
[Scientific advice by the nationally competent authority and by the EMEA on the conduct of clinical trials].国家主管当局和欧洲药品管理局就临床试验开展提供的科学建议
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Apr;48(4):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1022-9.
8
Clinical Trial Application in Europe: What Will Change with the New Regulation?欧洲的临床试验申请:新法规会带来哪些变化?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):451-66. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9662-0. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
GCP inspections in Germany and Europe following the implementation of the Directive 2001/20/EC.在实施2001/20/EC指令后德国和欧洲的药物临床试验质量管理规范检查
Ger Med Sci. 2009 Mar 31;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/000060.
10
[Compassionate use of non-approved medicinal products. Legal basis and guidelines].[未批准药品的同情用药。法律依据和指南]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009 Apr;52(4):439-43. doi: 10.1007/s00103-009-0829-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials within all disease areas.所有疾病领域内开展随机临床试验的障碍。
Trials. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2099-9.
2
Research ethics committees in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the United States.临床研究监管中的研究伦理委员会:芬兰与英国、加拿大和美国的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jan 19;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0078-3.
3
A pilot test of the new Swiss regulatory procedure for categorizing clinical trials by risk: A randomized controlled trial.瑞士新的按风险对临床试验进行分类的监管程序的初步试验:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Trials. 2015 Dec;12(6):677-87. doi: 10.1177/1740774515591983. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
Education and training for medicines development, regulation, and clinical research in emerging countries.新兴国家药品研发、监管及临床研究的教育与培训。
Front Pharmacol. 2015 Apr 14;6:80. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00080. eCollection 2015.
5
Actors involved in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the USA.参与临床研究监管的各方:芬兰与英国、加拿大和美国的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Apr 7;13:20. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0009-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A 1-year cross-sectional analysis of non-interventional post-marketing study protocols submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM).1 年横断面分析向德国联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(BfArM)提交的非干预性上市后研究方案。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;69(7):1453-66. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1482-z. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
2
The unintended consequences of clinical trials regulations.临床试验法规的意外后果。
PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;3(11):e1000131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000131. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
3
Risk analysis and risk adapted on-site monitoring in noncommercial clinical trials.非商业临床试验中的风险分析和风险适应现场监测。
Clin Trials. 2009 Dec;6(6):585-96. doi: 10.1177/1740774509347398. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
4
Common definition for categories of clinical research: a prerequisite for a survey on regulatory requirements by the European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN).临床研究类别通用定义:欧洲临床研究基础设施网络(ECRIN)开展监管要求调查的前提条件。
Trials. 2009 Oct 16;10:95. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-95.
5
Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events.氯吡格雷反应及心血管事件的遗传决定因素。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 22;360(4):363-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808227. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
6
Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?试验序贯监测界限能否减少荟萃分析中的虚假推断?
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;38(1):276-86. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn179. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
7
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.不同干预措施和结局的对照试验中治疗效果估计偏差的实证证据:Meta流行病学研究
BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
8
Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.序贯试验分析可以确定在累积荟萃分析中何时能获得确凿证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
9
How can we regulate medicines better?我们如何能更好地监管药品?
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):803-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39281.615706.94.
10
The clinical trials directive: how is it affecting Europe's noncommercial research?临床试验指令:它对欧洲的非商业性研究有何影响?
PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 Jun;1(2):e13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010013.