Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Bruderholz, CH-4101 Bruderholz, Switzerland.
BMC Med Imaging. 2012 Mar 29;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-5.
SPECT/CT combines high resolution anatomical 3D computerized tomography (CT) and single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) as functional imaging, which provides 3D information about biological processes into a single imaging modality. The clinical utility of SPECT/CT imaging has been recognized in a variety of medical fields and most recently in orthopaedics; however, clinical adoption has been limited due to shortcomings of analytical tools available. Specifically, SPECT analyses are mainly qualitative due to variation in overall metabolic uptake among patients. Furthermore, most analyses are done in 2D, although rich 3D data are available. Consequently, it is difficult to quantitatively compare the position, size, and intensity of SPECT uptake regions among patients, and therefore difficult to draw meaningful clinical conclusions.
We propose a method for normalizing orthopaedic SPECT/CT data that enables standardised 3D volumetric quantitative measurements and comparison among patients. Our method is based on 3D localisation using clinically relevant anatomical landmarks and frames of reference, along with intensity value normalisation using clinically relevant reference regions. Using the normalised data, we describe a thresholding technique to distinguish clinically relevant hot spots from background activity.
Using an exemplar comparison of two patients, we demonstrate how the normalised, 3D-rendered data can provide a richer source of clinical information and allow quantitative comparison of SPECT/CT measurements across patients. Specifically, we demonstrate how non-normalized SPECT/CT analysis can lead to different clinical conclusions than the normalized SPECT/CT analysis, and that normalized quantitative analysis can be a more accurate indicator of pathology.
Conventional orthopaedic frames of reference, 3D volumetric data analysis and thresholding are used to distinguish clinically relevant hot spots from background activity. Our goal is to facilitate a standardised approach to quantitative data collection and comparison of clinical studies using SPECT/CT, enabling more widespread clinical use of this powerful imaging tool.
SPECT/CT 将高分辨率解剖学 3D 计算机断层扫描(CT)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)结合为功能成像,将有关生物过程的 3D 信息提供到单一成像方式中。SPECT/CT 成像的临床应用已在多个医学领域得到认可,最近在骨科领域也得到认可;然而,由于现有分析工具的缺陷,临床应用受到限制。具体来说,由于患者之间整体代谢摄取的变化,SPECT 分析主要是定性的。此外,尽管有丰富的 3D 数据,但大多数分析都是在 2D 进行的。因此,很难在患者之间定量比较 SPECT 摄取区域的位置、大小和强度,因此很难得出有意义的临床结论。
我们提出了一种对骨科 SPECT/CT 数据进行归一化的方法,该方法可实现标准化的 3D 容积定量测量和患者之间的比较。我们的方法基于使用临床相关解剖学标志和参考系进行 3D 定位,以及使用临床相关参考区域进行强度值归一化。使用归一化数据,我们描述了一种用于区分临床相关热点与背景活动的阈值技术。
通过对两名患者的示例比较,我们展示了归一化的 3D 渲染数据如何提供更丰富的临床信息,并允许在患者之间进行 SPECT/CT 测量的定量比较。具体来说,我们展示了非归一化 SPECT/CT 分析如何导致与归一化 SPECT/CT 分析不同的临床结论,以及归一化定量分析如何成为病理更准确的指标。
传统的骨科参考系、3D 容积数据分析和阈值用于区分临床相关热点与背景活动。我们的目标是促进使用 SPECT/CT 进行定量数据采集和临床研究比较的标准化方法,使这种强大的成像工具得到更广泛的临床应用。