• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do personality traits moderate the impact of care receipt on end-of-life care planning?人格特质是否会调节照顾者接受程度对临终关怀计划的影响?
Gerontologist. 2012 Dec;52(6):759-69. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns044. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Advance directives are more likely among seniors asked about end-of-life care preferences.在被问及临终护理偏好的老年人中,预先指示更为常见。
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Apr 12;159(7):701-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.7.701.
3
"I don't want to die like that ...": the impact of significant others' death quality on advance care planning.“我不想那样死去……”:重要他人死亡质量对预先医疗照护计划的影响。
Gerontologist. 2012 Dec;52(6):770-81. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns051. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
4
End-of-Life Care Planning: Perspectives of Returning Citizens.末期医疗照护规划:回归公民的观点。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2024 Apr 1;26(2):82-90. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000999. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
5
An assessment of social diffusion in the Respecting Choices advance care planning program.尊重选择预先护理计划项目中的社会扩散评估。
Death Stud. 2012 Apr;36(4):301-22. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2011.584016.
6
Religious coping and behavioral disengagement: opposing influences on advance care planning and receipt of intensive care near death.宗教应对与行为脱离:对临终前预先医疗规划和接受重症监护的正反影响。
Psychooncology. 2012 Jul;21(7):714-23. doi: 10.1002/pon.1967. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
7
Personality and health care decision-making style.个性与医疗保健决策风格。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Sep;62(5):P261-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.5.p261.
8
The personal and social context of planning for end-of-life care.临终关怀规划的个人与社会背景。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jul;52(7):1163-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52316.x.
9
End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: an assessment of psychosocial influences.年轻老年人的临终医疗护理规划:心理社会影响评估
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):S135-41. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.s135.
10
Do Personality Traits Mediate the Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Migraine? An Exploration of the Relationships in Young Adults Using the Add Health Dataset.人格特质是否在儿童期虐待与偏头痛之间起中介作用?利用“健康增进纵向研究”数据对青年期两者关系的探讨。
Headache. 2018 Feb;58(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/head.13206. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation.关于衰老相关准备的观点。
J Elder Policy. 2021 Spring;1(2). doi: 10.18278/jep.1.2.7.
2
Occupational differences in advance care planning: Are medical professionals more likely to plan?预先护理计划中的职业差异:医学专业人员进行规划的可能性更大吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113730. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113730. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Effect of Advance Care Planning on Surrogate Decision Makers' Preparedness for Decision Making: Results of a Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.预先医疗照护计划对代理人决策准备度的影响:一项混合方法随机对照试验的结果。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;24(7):982-993. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0238. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
4
A Question of Trust: Does Mistrust or Perceived Discrimination Account for Race Disparities in Advance Directive Completion?信任问题:不信任或感知到的歧视能否解释生前预嘱完成情况中的种族差异?
Innov Aging. 2017 Sep 7;1(1):igx017. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx017. eCollection 2017 Mar 1.
5
Associations Between Personality and End-of-Life Care Preferences Among Men With Prostate Cancer: A Clustering Approach.前列腺癌男性患者的人格与临终关怀偏好之间的关联:一种聚类分析方法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
6
Care Preferences Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Chronic Disease in Europe: Individual Health Care Needs and National Health Care Infrastructure.欧洲中老年慢性病患者的护理偏好:个人医疗保健需求与国家医疗保健基础设施
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):687-701. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu119. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.生前预嘱与代理人决策的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1211-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901.
2
How are personality traits related to preparation for future care needs in older adults?人格特质与老年人未来护理需求的准备情况有何关联?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Nov;63(6):P328-36. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.6.p328.
3
Personality and mortality risk across the life span: the importance of conscientiousness as a biopsychosocial attribute.人格与全生命周期的死亡风险:尽责性作为一种生物心理社会属性的重要性。
Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;26(4):428-36. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.428.
4
End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: an assessment of psychosocial influences.年轻老年人的临终医疗护理规划:心理社会影响评估
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):S135-41. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.s135.
5
Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life.觉得自己是他人的负担:一项聚焦于生命末期的系统评价
Palliat Med. 2007 Mar;21(2):115-28. doi: 10.1177/0269216307076345.
6
Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study.预立医疗指示与临终关怀质量之间的关联:一项全国性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Feb;55(2):189-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01045.x.
7
Social control of health behavior: associations with conscientiousness and neuroticism.健康行为的社会控制:与尽责性和神经质的关联
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;32(9):1143-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289728.
8
Personality and anxiety disorders.人格与焦虑症。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2006 Aug;8(4):263-9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-006-0061-8.
9
Factors affecting long-term-care residents' decision-making processes as they formulate advance directives.影响长期护理机构居民制定预先医疗指示时决策过程的因素。
Gerontologist. 2005 Oct;45(5):626-33. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.5.626.
10
Personality development: stability and change.人格发展:稳定性与变化
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:453-84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.

人格特质是否会调节照顾者接受程度对临终关怀计划的影响?

Do personality traits moderate the impact of care receipt on end-of-life care planning?

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, Seoul National University, Seoul 137-782, Korea.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2012 Dec;52(6):759-69. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns044. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gns044
PMID:22459693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3495908/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study examines (a) the association between being a care recipient and end-of-life care planning (EOLCP) and (b) the extent to which personality traits moderate the relationship between care receipt and EOLCP.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data are drawn from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, a survey of Wisconsin high school graduates from 1957 to 2004. We used data on EOLCP among older adults in the most recent (2003-2004) wave of this survey. Hierarchical logistic regression models are used to estimate the effects of care receipt and the moderating effects of personality.

RESULTS

Compared with their peers who are not receiving care, care recipients are more likely to engage in informal discussion on EOLCP. This association between care receipt and informal EOLCP is strengthened when the individual scores high on openness.

IMPLICATIONS

Health practitioners should take into account older adults' care needs and differing personality traits while helping older adults make successful EOLCP.

摘要

研究目的

本研究考察了(a)作为护理接受者与临终关怀计划(EOLCP)之间的关系,以及(b)个性特征在多大程度上调节了护理接受与 EOLCP 之间的关系。

设计与方法

数据来自威斯康星州纵向研究,该研究是对 1957 年至 2004 年威斯康星州高中毕业生的一项调查。我们使用了该调查最近(2003-2004 年)一轮中关于老年人 EOLCP 的数据。分层逻辑回归模型用于估计护理接受的影响和个性的调节作用。

结果

与没有接受护理的同龄人相比,接受护理的人更有可能就 EOLCP 进行非正式讨论。当个体在开放性上得分较高时,这种护理接受与非正式 EOLCP 之间的关联会增强。

启示

医疗保健从业者在帮助老年人进行成功的 EOLCP 时,应考虑到老年人的护理需求和不同的个性特征。