Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034273. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
There is evidence that interventions aiming at modulation of the motor cortex activity lead to pain reduction. In order to understand further the role of the motor cortex on pain modulation, we aimed to compare the behavioral (pressure pain threshold) and neurophysiological effects (transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced cortical excitability) across three different motor tasks.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Fifteen healthy male subjects were enrolled in this randomized, controlled, blinded, cross-over designed study. Three different tasks were tested including motor learning with and without visual feedback, and simple hand movements. Cortical excitability was assessed using single and paired-pulse TMS measures such as resting motor threshold (RMT), motor-evoked potential (MEP), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), and cortical silent period (CSP). All tasks showed significant reduction in pain perception represented by an increase in pressure pain threshold compared to the control condition (untrained hand). ANOVA indicated a difference among the three tasks regarding motor cortex excitability change. There was a significant increase in motor cortex excitability (as indexed by MEP increase and CSP shortening) for the simple hand movements.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although different motor tasks involving motor learning with and without visual feedback and simple hand movements appear to change pain perception similarly, it is likely that the neural mechanisms might not be the same as evidenced by differential effects in motor cortex excitability induced by these tasks. In addition, TMS-indexed motor excitability measures are not likely good markers to index the effects of motor-based tasks on pain perception in healthy subjects as other neural networks besides primary motor cortex might be involved with pain modulation during motor training.
有证据表明,旨在调节运动皮层活动的干预措施可导致疼痛减轻。为了进一步了解运动皮层在疼痛调节中的作用,我们旨在比较三种不同运动任务的行为(压痛阈值)和神经生理效应(经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱导的皮层兴奋性)。
方法/主要发现:15 名健康男性受试者被纳入这项随机、对照、盲法、交叉设计研究。测试了三种不同的任务,包括有和没有视觉反馈的运动学习,以及简单的手部运动。使用单脉冲和双脉冲 TMS 测量来评估皮层兴奋性,例如静息运动阈值(RMT)、运动诱发电位(MEP)、皮层内易化(ICF)、短程皮质内抑制(SICI)和皮质静息期(CSP)。与对照条件(未经训练的手)相比,所有任务均显示出疼痛感知明显降低,表现为压痛阈值增加。方差分析表明,三种任务在运动皮层兴奋性变化方面存在差异。简单手部运动的运动皮层兴奋性显著增加(表现为 MEP 增加和 CSP 缩短)。
结论/意义:尽管涉及有和没有视觉反馈的运动学习以及简单手部运动的不同运动任务似乎同样可以改变疼痛感知,但很可能神经机制并不相同,因为这些任务对运动皮层兴奋性的影响不同。此外,TMS 指数化的运动兴奋性测量可能不是评估基于运动的任务对健康受试者疼痛感知影响的良好指标,因为在运动训练期间,除了初级运动皮层之外,其他神经网络可能参与疼痛调节。