• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美托洛尔、培哚普利和维拉帕米对马凡综合征血流动力学和血管功能的影响:一项随机、双盲、交叉试验。

Effects of atenolol, perindopril and verapamil on haemodynamic and vascular function in Marfan syndrome - a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.

机构信息

Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff University, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;42(8):891-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02668.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02668.x
PMID:22471392
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic dilatation is the main therapeutic target in patients with Marfan syndrome. Standard treatment with a β-blocker may not lower central pulse pressure - the major objective - because it does not do so in hypertension, unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers. We therefore performed a prospective, randomised, double-blind, crossover trial to compare the effects of these three agents on large artery function and central aortic pressure in patients with Marfan syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighteen patients had applanation tonometry, pulse wave analysis and echocardiography, before and after atenolol 75 mg, perindopril 4 mg and verapamil 240 mg, each given for 4 weeks, in a random order, with 2 weeks between medications. Fourteen patients completed the study. Within-drug comparisons demonstrated that perindopril (-10·3 mmHg, P = 0·002), verapamil (-9·2 mmHg, P = 0·003) and atenolol (-7·1 mmHg, P = 0·01) all reduced central systolic pressure and brachial pressure; central changes were least, and peripheral changes greatest with atenolol but between-drug comparisons (analysis of covariance) were not significant. There was a trend for augmentation to be reduced by perindopril (-6·3%, P = 0·05), verapamil (-5·5%, P = 0·07) and atenolol (-3·2%, P = 0·09). Only atenolol reduced heart rate (by 16%) and delayed expansion in the arch and abdominal aorta (by 8% and 11%) (P < 0·001, P < 0·01 and P < 0·05, respectively, for between-drug comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Perindopril, verapamil and atenolol all reduced peripheral and central systolic pressure. As atenolol slowed heart rate and delayed aortic wave travel, β-blockade may have a continuing role in the treatment of patients with Marfan syndrome.

摘要

背景

马凡综合征的主要治疗目标是主动脉扩张。标准的β受体阻滞剂治疗可能无法降低中心脉搏压(主要目标),因为它在高血压中没有这样的作用,而血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂则有。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉试验,以比较这三种药物对马凡综合征患者大动脉功能和中心主动脉压的影响。

方法和结果

18 名患者接受了平板张力测量、脉搏波分析和超声心动图检查,在服用阿替洛尔 75mg、培哚普利 4mg 和维拉帕米 240mg 前、后各进行了一次,每种药物服用 4 周,顺序随机,每种药物之间间隔 2 周。14 名患者完成了研究。药物内比较显示,培哚普利(-10.3mmHg,P=0.002)、维拉帕米(-9.2mmHg,P=0.003)和阿替洛尔(-7.1mmHg,P=0.01)均降低了中心收缩压和肱动脉压;阿替洛尔中心变化最小,外周变化最大,但药物间比较(协方差分析)无显著性差异。培哚普利(-6.3%,P=0.05)、维拉帕米(-5.5%,P=0.07)和阿替洛尔(-3.2%,P=0.09)均有减少增强的趋势。只有阿替洛尔降低了心率(16%),并延迟了弓部和腹主动脉的扩张(分别为 8%和 11%)(P<0.001、P<0.01 和 P<0.05,药物间比较)。

结论

培哚普利、维拉帕米和阿替洛尔均降低了外周和中心收缩压。由于阿替洛尔降低了心率并延迟了主动脉波的传播,β受体阻滞剂在马凡综合征患者的治疗中可能仍有作用。

相似文献

1
Effects of atenolol, perindopril and verapamil on haemodynamic and vascular function in Marfan syndrome - a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.美托洛尔、培哚普利和维拉帕米对马凡综合征血流动力学和血管功能的影响:一项随机、双盲、交叉试验。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;42(8):891-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02668.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
2
Effect of perindopril on large artery stiffness and aortic root diameter in patients with Marfan syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.培哚普利对马方综合征患者大动脉僵硬度和主动脉根部直径的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2007 Oct 3;298(13):1539-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1539.
3
Different aortic reflection wave responses following long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and beta-blocker in essential hypertension.原发性高血压患者长期应用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂后不同的主动脉反射波反应
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2001 Dec;28(12):1074-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2001.03570.x.
4
Different patterns of peripheral versus central blood pressure in hypertensive patients treated with β-blockers either with or without vasodilator properties or with angiotensin receptor blockers.在接受具有或不具有血管扩张特性的β受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗的高血压患者中,外周血压与中心血压的不同模式。
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Oct;15(5):235-9. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833c8a64.
5
Efficacy of Sevikar® compared to the combination of perindopril plus amlodipine on central arterial blood pressure in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension: Rationale and design of the SEVITENSION study.西伐卡®对比培哚普利氨氯地平复方制剂对中重度高血压患者中心动脉血压疗效的研究:SEVITENSION 研究的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 May 14.
6
A double blind comparison of perindopril and atenolol in essential hypertension.培哚普利与阿替洛尔治疗原发性高血压的双盲对照研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Oct;4(5):547-52.
7
Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring efficacy of perindopril/indapamide first-line combination in hypertensive patients: the REASON study.培哚普利/吲达帕胺一线联合用药对高血压患者的24小时动态血压监测疗效:REASON研究
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Mar;17(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.11.001.
8
Blood pressure response under chronic antihypertensive drug therapy: the role of aortic stiffness in the REASON (Preterax in Regression of Arterial Stiffness in a Controlled Double-Blind) study.慢性抗高血压药物治疗下的血压反应:主动脉僵硬度在REASON(培哚普利在控制双盲试验中对动脉僵硬度的逆转作用)研究中的作用
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 3;53(5):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.046.
9
Amelioration of arterial properties with a perindopril-indapamide very-low-dose combination.培哚普利-吲达帕胺极低剂量联合用药改善动脉特性
J Hypertens Suppl. 2001 Nov;19(4):S15-20.
10
Beta-blocking therapy in patients with the Marfan syndrome and entire aortic replacement.马凡综合征患者的β受体阻滞剂治疗与全主动脉置换术
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Nov;26(5):901-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.07.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Opportunities of Marfan Syndrome: Current Perspectives.马凡综合征的治疗机遇:当前观点
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Aug 26;19:7365-7379. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S523571. eCollection 2025.
2
Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Diseases.遗传性胸主动脉疾病
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;14(1):112. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010112.
3
Marfan Syndrome: Enhanced Diagnostic Tools and Follow-up Management Strategies.马凡氏综合征:增强的诊断工具及随访管理策略
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;13(13):2284. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132284.
4
An update of medical care in Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征医疗护理的最新进展。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Sep 10;34(1):44-48. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_95_20. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
5
An Overview of Investigational and Experimental Drug Treatment Strategies for Marfan Syndrome.马凡氏综合征的研究性和实验性药物治疗策略概述
J Exp Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 11;13:755-779. doi: 10.2147/JEP.S265271. eCollection 2021.
6
Medical Therapies for Marfan Syndrome and Other Thoracic Aortic Dilatation in Adults: A Contemporary Review.成人马凡综合征和其他胸主动脉扩张的医学治疗:当代综述。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 Nov;21(6):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s40256-021-00472-y. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Medical management of aortic disease in Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征主动脉疾病的医学管理
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov;6(6):654-661. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.11.09.
8
Beta-blockers for preventing aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome.β受体阻滞剂预防马凡综合征患者主动脉夹层形成
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 7;11(11):CD011103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011103.pub2.
9
Molecular pathogenesis of genetic and sporadic aortic aneurysms and dissections.遗传性和散发性主动脉瘤及夹层的分子发病机制。
Curr Probl Surg. 2017 Mar;54(3):95-155. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10
Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis.抗高血压药物对中心收缩压和增强指数的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2016 Apr;29(4):448-57. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv134. Epub 2015 Aug 19.