Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff University, UK.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Aug;42(8):891-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02668.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Aortic dilatation is the main therapeutic target in patients with Marfan syndrome. Standard treatment with a β-blocker may not lower central pulse pressure - the major objective - because it does not do so in hypertension, unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers. We therefore performed a prospective, randomised, double-blind, crossover trial to compare the effects of these three agents on large artery function and central aortic pressure in patients with Marfan syndrome.
Eighteen patients had applanation tonometry, pulse wave analysis and echocardiography, before and after atenolol 75 mg, perindopril 4 mg and verapamil 240 mg, each given for 4 weeks, in a random order, with 2 weeks between medications. Fourteen patients completed the study. Within-drug comparisons demonstrated that perindopril (-10·3 mmHg, P = 0·002), verapamil (-9·2 mmHg, P = 0·003) and atenolol (-7·1 mmHg, P = 0·01) all reduced central systolic pressure and brachial pressure; central changes were least, and peripheral changes greatest with atenolol but between-drug comparisons (analysis of covariance) were not significant. There was a trend for augmentation to be reduced by perindopril (-6·3%, P = 0·05), verapamil (-5·5%, P = 0·07) and atenolol (-3·2%, P = 0·09). Only atenolol reduced heart rate (by 16%) and delayed expansion in the arch and abdominal aorta (by 8% and 11%) (P < 0·001, P < 0·01 and P < 0·05, respectively, for between-drug comparisons).
Perindopril, verapamil and atenolol all reduced peripheral and central systolic pressure. As atenolol slowed heart rate and delayed aortic wave travel, β-blockade may have a continuing role in the treatment of patients with Marfan syndrome.
马凡综合征的主要治疗目标是主动脉扩张。标准的β受体阻滞剂治疗可能无法降低中心脉搏压(主要目标),因为它在高血压中没有这样的作用,而血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂则有。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉试验,以比较这三种药物对马凡综合征患者大动脉功能和中心主动脉压的影响。
18 名患者接受了平板张力测量、脉搏波分析和超声心动图检查,在服用阿替洛尔 75mg、培哚普利 4mg 和维拉帕米 240mg 前、后各进行了一次,每种药物服用 4 周,顺序随机,每种药物之间间隔 2 周。14 名患者完成了研究。药物内比较显示,培哚普利(-10.3mmHg,P=0.002)、维拉帕米(-9.2mmHg,P=0.003)和阿替洛尔(-7.1mmHg,P=0.01)均降低了中心收缩压和肱动脉压;阿替洛尔中心变化最小,外周变化最大,但药物间比较(协方差分析)无显著性差异。培哚普利(-6.3%,P=0.05)、维拉帕米(-5.5%,P=0.07)和阿替洛尔(-3.2%,P=0.09)均有减少增强的趋势。只有阿替洛尔降低了心率(16%),并延迟了弓部和腹主动脉的扩张(分别为 8%和 11%)(P<0.001、P<0.01 和 P<0.05,药物间比较)。
培哚普利、维拉帕米和阿替洛尔均降低了外周和中心收缩压。由于阿替洛尔降低了心率并延迟了主动脉波的传播,β受体阻滞剂在马凡综合征患者的治疗中可能仍有作用。