University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Caries Res. 2012;46(2):118-29. doi: 10.1159/000337241. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
This randomized parallel group clinical trial assessed whether combined antibacterial and fluoride therapy benefits the balance between caries pathological and protective factors. Eligible, enrolled adults (n = 231), with 1-7 baseline cavitated teeth, attending a dental school clinic were randomly assigned to a control or intervention group. Salivary mutans streptococci (MS), lactobacilli (LB), fluoride (F) level, and resulting caries risk status (low or high) assays were determined at baseline and every 6 months. After baseline, all cavitated teeth were restored. An examiner masked to group conducted caries exams at baseline and 2 years after completing restorations. The intervention group used fluoride dentifrice (1,100 ppm F as NaF), 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate rinse based upon bacterial challenge (MS and LB), and 0.05% NaF rinse based upon salivary F. For the primary outcome, mean caries increment, no statistically significant difference was observed (24% difference between control and intervention groups, p = 0.101). However, the supplemental adjusted zero-inflated Poisson caries increment (change in DMFS) model showed the intervention group had a statistically significantly 24% lower mean than the control group (p = 0.020). Overall, caries risk reduced significantly in intervention versus control over 2 years (baseline adjusted generalized linear mixed models odds ratio, aOR = 3.45; 95% CI: 1.67, 7.13). Change in MS bacterial challenge differed significantly between groups (aOR = 6.70; 95% CI: 2.96, 15.13) but not for LB or F. Targeted antibacterial and fluoride therapy based on salivary microbial and fluoride levels favorably altered the balance between pathological and protective caries risk factors.
这项随机平行组临床试验评估了联合使用抗菌和氟化物疗法是否有益于平衡龋齿的病理和保护因素。符合条件、已登记的成年人(n=231),基线时有 1-7 颗龋坏牙,在牙科学院诊所就诊,被随机分配到对照组或干预组。在基线和每 6 个月时,测定唾液变形链球菌(MS)、乳杆菌(LB)、氟化物(F)水平以及由此产生的龋齿风险状况(低或高)。基线后,所有龋坏牙均被修复。一位对分组情况不知情的检查者在基线和修复完成后 2 年时进行了龋齿检查。干预组使用含氟牙膏(1100ppm F 作为 NaF)、根据细菌挑战(MS 和 LB)使用 0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定漱口液、根据唾液 F 使用 0.05%NaF 漱口液。对于主要结局,平均龋齿增量,两组间无统计学显著差异(对照组和干预组相差 24%,p=0.101)。然而,补充调整的零膨胀泊松龋齿增量(DMFS 变化)模型显示,干预组的平均龋齿增量比对照组低 24%,具有统计学显著差异(p=0.020)。总体而言,干预组与对照组相比,在 2 年内龋齿风险显著降低(基线调整的广义线性混合模型比值比,aOR=3.45;95%置信区间:1.67,7.13)。组间 MS 细菌挑战的变化有显著差异(aOR=6.70;95%置信区间:2.96,15.13),但 LB 或 F 没有差异。基于唾液微生物和氟化物水平的靶向抗菌和氟化物治疗,有利地改变了病理和保护性龋齿风险因素之间的平衡。