Cheng J, Chaffee B W, Cheng N F, Gansky S A, Featherstone J D B
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Dent Res. 2015 Jan;94(1):44-51. doi: 10.1177/0022034514555365. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
The Caries Management By Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) randomized controlled trial showed that an intervention featuring combined antibacterial and fluoride therapy significantly reduced bacterial load and suggested reduced caries increment in adults with 1 to 7 baseline cavitated teeth. While trial results speak to the overall effectiveness of an intervention, insight can be gained from understanding the mechanism by which an intervention acts on putative intermediate variables (mediators) to affect outcomes. This study conducted mediation analyses on 109 participants who completed the trial to understand whether the intervention reduced caries increment through its action on potential mediators (oral bacterial load, fluoride levels, and overall caries risk based on the composite of bacterial challenge and salivary fluoride) between the intervention and dental outcomes. The primary outcome was the increment from baseline in decayed, missing, and filled permanent surfaces (ΔDMFS) 24 mo after completing restorations for baseline cavitated lesions. Analyses adjusted for baseline overall risk, bacterial challenge, and fluoride values under a potential outcome framework using generalized linear models. Overall, the CAMBRA intervention was suggestive in reducing the 24-mo DMFS increment (reduction in ΔDMFS: -0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.01 to 0.08; P = 0.07); the intervention significantly reduced the 12-mo overall risk (reduction in overall risk: -19%; 95% CI, -7 to -41%;], P = 0.005). Individual mediators, salivary log10 mutans streptococci, log10 lactobacilli, and fluoride level, did not represent statistically significant pathways alone through which the intervention effect was transmitted. However, 36% of the intervention effect on 24-mo DMFS increment was through a mediation effect on 12-mo overall risk (P = 0.03). These findings suggest a greater intervention effect carried through the combined action on multiple aspects of the caries process rather than through any single factor. In addition, a substantial portion of the total effect of the CAMBRA intervention may have operated through unanticipated or unmeasured pathways not included among the potential mediators studied.
通过风险评估进行龋病管理(CAMBRA)随机对照试验表明,一种结合抗菌和氟化物疗法的干预措施显著降低了细菌载量,并表明基线时有1至7颗已出现龋洞牙齿的成年人龋齿增加量有所减少。虽然试验结果说明了一种干预措施的总体有效性,但通过了解干预措施作用于假定中间变量(中介变量)以影响结果的机制,可以获得更深入的认识。本研究对109名完成试验的参与者进行了中介分析,以了解该干预措施是否通过作用于干预与牙齿结果之间的潜在中介变量(口腔细菌载量、氟化物水平以及基于细菌挑战和唾液氟化物综合情况的总体龋病风险)来降低龋齿增加量。主要结局是在完成对基线龋洞病变的修复后24个月时,龋失补牙面(ΔDMFS)相对于基线的增加量。分析在潜在结果框架下,使用广义线性模型对基线总体风险、细菌挑战和氟化物值进行了校正。总体而言,CAMBRA干预措施在降低24个月时的DMFS增加量方面具有一定提示作用(ΔDMFS减少:-0.96;95%置信区间[CI]:-2.01至0.08;P = 0.07);该干预措施显著降低了12个月时的总体风险(总体风险降低:-19%;95% CI,-7至-41%;P = 0.005)。单个中介变量,即唾液中变形链球菌的log10值、乳酸杆菌的log10值和氟化物水平,单独而言并不代表干预效果得以传递的具有统计学意义的途径。然而,干预措施对24个月时DMFS增加量的影响中有36%是通过对12个月时总体风险的中介作用实现的(P = 0.03)。这些发现表明,通过对龋病过程多个方面的联合作用而非任何单一因素,干预效果更为显著。此外,CAMBRA干预措施总效果的很大一部分可能是通过未在研究的潜在中介变量中包括的意外或未测量途径发挥作用的。