Psycho-Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Family and Consumer Sciences, Kamakura Women's University, Kamakura; Departments of Epidemiology; Behavioral Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai.
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1973-1979. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds061. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Various risk factors for depression in lung cancer patients have been suggested but have been examined separately in studies with relatively small sample sizes. The present study examined the biopsychosocial risk factors of depression in lung cancer patients, focusing on psychological factors in the largest patient sample reported to date.
A total of 1334 consecutively recruited lung cancer patients were selected, and data on cancer-related variables, personal characteristics, health behaviors, physical symptoms, and psychological factors were obtained. The participants were divided into groups with or without depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Among the recruited patients, 165 (12.4%) manifested depression. The results of a binary logistic regression analysis were significant (overall R2, 36.5%), and a greater risk for depression was strongly associated with psychological factors, such as personality characteristics (neuroticism) and coping style (low fighting spirit, helplessness/hopelessness, and anxious preoccupation). Although the contributions of cancer-related variables, personal characteristics, health behaviors, and clinical state were relatively low, cancer stage, cancer type, sex, and age correlated significantly with depression.
Depression was most strongly linked with personality traits and coping style, and using screening instruments to identify these factors may be useful for preventive interventions.
已经提出了各种与肺癌患者抑郁相关的风险因素,但在研究中这些因素都是分别进行检查的,而且这些研究的样本量相对较小。本研究在迄今报告的最大肺癌患者样本中,重点关注心理因素,以检查肺癌患者抑郁的生物心理社会风险因素。
共选择了 1334 名连续招募的肺癌患者,并获得了与癌症相关的变量、个人特征、健康行为、身体症状和心理因素的数据。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表将参与者分为有或无抑郁的组。
在招募的患者中,有 165 名(12.4%)表现出抑郁。二项逻辑回归分析的结果具有统计学意义(总体 R2,36.5%),抑郁的风险更高与心理因素密切相关,如人格特征(神经质)和应对方式(斗志低、无助/绝望和焦虑担忧)。尽管癌症相关变量、个人特征、健康行为和临床状态的贡献相对较低,但癌症分期、癌症类型、性别和年龄与抑郁显著相关。
抑郁与人格特征和应对方式的相关性最强,使用筛查工具识别这些因素可能对预防干预有用。