College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Lung Cancer. 2011 Feb;71(2):235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Researchers have shown that coping style is related to pain and adjustment in people with chronic illness. This study was the first to examine how coping style related to pain, pain coping strategies, and depression in lung cancer outpatients. We conducted a comparative, secondary data analysis of 107 lung cancer patients (73% male, mean age 61.4±10.43 years, 88% Caucasian). As in prior studies, we classified patients into four coping style groups based on Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and trait anxiety scores. The coping style groups were low-anxious (n=25); high-anxious (n=31); defensive high-anxious (n=21); and repressive (n=30). Compared to other coping style groups, the repressive group reported statistically significant lower mean scores for pain quality, pain catastrophizing, and depression. Assessing coping style by measuring personal characteristics such as social desirability and trait anxiety may help clinicians to identify vulnerable individuals with lung cancer who may be candidates for early and timely intervention efforts to enhance adjustment to pain.
研究人员已经表明,应对方式与慢性病患者的疼痛和适应有关。本研究首次探讨了应对方式与肺癌门诊患者的疼痛、疼痛应对策略和抑郁之间的关系。我们对 107 名肺癌患者(73%为男性,平均年龄 61.4±10.43 岁,88%为白种人)进行了比较性的二次数据分析。与之前的研究一样,我们根据 Marlowe-Crowne 社会期望量表和特质焦虑评分将患者分为四种应对方式组。应对方式组包括低焦虑组(n=25)、高焦虑组(n=31)、防御性高焦虑组(n=21)和压抑组(n=30)。与其他应对方式组相比,压抑组在疼痛质量、疼痛灾难化和抑郁方面的平均得分明显较低。通过测量社会期望和特质焦虑等个人特征来评估应对方式,可能有助于临床医生识别易受影响的肺癌患者,这些患者可能是早期和及时干预措施的候选者,以增强对疼痛的适应能力。