Neuropsychology Unit, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;28(1):91-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.3794. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
This study evaluates the efficacy at 12 months of a computer-based cognitive training (CBCT) program, adjunctive to traditional cognitive training (TCT), on the basis of pen-and-paper exercises.
Sixty patients with multi-domain mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease who were already receiving cognitive training, recruited from a day hospital, were assigned into two groups following a simple randomization procedure (computerized random numbers): (i) a group that received CBCT during 3 months and TCT (CBCT + TCT), n = 37, and (ii) a group that received only TCT, n = 23. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of treatment by a neuropsychologist blinded to group assignment, with a neuropsychological battery (primary outcomes) and measures of decision making, memory complaints, and emotional disturbances.
With the use of repeated-measures analyses of covariance, the CBCT + TCT group showed less anxiety symptoms (F = 5.13, p = 0.03, d = 1.12) and less disadvantageous choices (F = 4.70, p = 0.04, d = 0.89) in decision making than the TCT group at 12 months. No significant improvement or worsening was observed in the other measures examined. However, positive effect sizes favoring the CBCT + TCT group were observed in all variables.
The addition of a CBCT program was effective in anxiety and decision making but had no significant effects on outcomes in basic cognitive functions in patients who were already receiving cognitive training, possibly due to a ceiling effect. Future studies should compare the efficacy of CBCT with TCT in naïve patients.
本研究评估了基于纸笔练习的计算机认知训练(CBCT)辅助传统认知训练(TCT)在 12 个月时的疗效。
从日间医院招募了 60 名已接受认知训练的多领域轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病患者,采用简单随机分组(计算机生成的随机数)将他们分为两组:(i)接受 3 个月 CBCT 和 TCT 的组(CBCT + TCT,n = 37),和(ii)仅接受 TCT 的组(n = 23)。患者在基线、治疗 3 个月和 12 个月时由一名对分组不知情的神经心理学家进行评估,采用神经心理学测试(主要结局)以及决策、记忆主诉和情绪障碍的评估。
使用重复测量方差分析,CBCT + TCT 组在 12 个月时在决策方面表现出较少的焦虑症状(F = 5.13,p = 0.03,d = 1.12)和更不利的选择(F = 4.70,p = 0.04,d = 0.89),优于 TCT 组。在其他检查的指标中,没有观察到显著的改善或恶化。然而,在所有观察到的变量中,CBCT + TCT 组都表现出了正向的效应大小。
在已经接受认知训练的患者中,添加 CBCT 程序在焦虑和决策方面是有效的,但对基本认知功能的结果没有显著影响,这可能是由于存在天花板效应。未来的研究应该比较 CBCT 与 TCT 在初治患者中的疗效。