Heikkinen Katja, Leino-Kilpi H, Salanterä S
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Vanhalinna, Finland.
Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(4):295-300. doi: 10.3414/ME11-02-0004. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
There is a growing need for patient education and an evaluation of its outcomes.
The aim of this study was to compare ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients' knowledge with Internet-based education and face-to-face education with a nurse. The following hypothesis was proposed: Internet-based patient education (experiment) is as effective as face-to-face education with a nurse (control) in increasing patients' level of knowledge and sufficiency of knowledge. In addition, the correlations of demographic variables were tested.
The patients were randomized to either an experiment group (n = 72) or a control group (n = 75). Empirical data were collected with two instruments.
Patients in both groups showed improvement in their knowledge during their care. Patients in the experiment group improved their knowledge level significantly more in total than those patients in the control group. There were no differences in patients' sufficiency of knowledge between the groups. Knowledge was correlated especially with patients' age, gender and earlier ambulatory surgeries.
As a conclusion, positive results concerning patients' knowledge could be achieved with the Internet-based education. The Internet is a viable method in ambulatory care.
患者教育及其效果评估的需求日益增长。
本研究旨在比较门诊骨科手术患者通过基于互联网的教育与护士面对面教育所获得的知识。提出了以下假设:在提高患者知识水平和知识充足性方面,基于互联网的患者教育(实验组)与护士面对面教育(对照组)同样有效。此外,还测试了人口统计学变量的相关性。
将患者随机分为实验组(n = 72)或对照组(n = 75)。使用两种工具收集实证数据。
两组患者在护理期间的知识均有所提高。实验组患者的知识水平总体上比对照组患者提高得更为显著。两组患者在知识充足性方面没有差异。知识尤其与患者的年龄、性别和既往门诊手术相关。
总之,基于互联网的教育在患者知识方面取得了积极成果。互联网是门诊护理中的一种可行方法。