• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建共同管理模式:通过在澳大利亚原住民地区建立伙伴关系解决问题。

Building co-management as a process: problem solving through partnerships in Aboriginal country, Australia.

机构信息

Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2012 Jun;49(6):1130-42. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9845-2. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-012-9845-2
PMID:22476668
Abstract

Collaborative problem solving has increasingly become important in the face of the complexities in the management of resources, including protected areas. The strategy undertaken by Girringun Aboriginal Corporation in north tropical Queensland, Australia, for developing co-management demonstrates the potential for a problem solving approach involving sequential initiatives, as an alternative to the more familiar negotiated agreements for co-management. Our longitudinal case study focuses on the development of indigenous ranger units as a strategic mechanism for the involvement of traditional owners in managing their country in collaboration with government and other interested parties. This was followed by Australia's first traditional use of marine resources agreement, and development of a multi-jurisdictional, land to sea, indigenous protected area. In using a relationship building approach to develop regional scale co-management, Girringun has been strengthening its capabilities as collaborator and regional service provider, thus, bringing customary decision-making structures into play to 'care for country'. From this evolving process we have identified the key components of a relationship building strategy, 'the pillars of co-management'. This approach includes learning-by-doing, the building of respect and rapport, sorting out responsibilities, practical engagement, and capacity-building.

摘要

面对资源管理(包括保护区管理)的复杂性,协作解决问题变得越来越重要。澳大利亚昆士兰州北部吉灵古纳原住民公司在发展共同管理方面采取的策略,展示了一种潜在的解决方案,即采用循序渐进的举措,而不是更常见的共同管理协商协议。我们的纵向案例研究侧重于发展原住民护林员队伍,作为传统所有者与政府和其他利益相关方合作管理其国家的战略机制。随后,澳大利亚首次达成了传统海洋资源使用协议,并开发了一个多司法管辖区、陆海相连的原住民保护区。吉灵古纳通过建立关系的方法来发展区域规模的共同管理,加强了其作为协作者和区域服务提供商的能力,从而使习惯决策结构得以发挥作用,以“关爱国家”。从这个不断发展的过程中,我们确定了关系建立策略的关键组成部分,即“共同管理的支柱”。这种方法包括在实践中学习、建立尊重和融洽关系、理清责任、实际参与和能力建设。

相似文献

1
Building co-management as a process: problem solving through partnerships in Aboriginal country, Australia.构建共同管理模式:通过在澳大利亚原住民地区建立伙伴关系解决问题。
Environ Manage. 2012 Jun;49(6):1130-42. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9845-2. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
2
Co-management: concepts and methodological implications.共同管理:概念与方法学意义
J Environ Manage. 2005 Apr;75(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008.
3
GIS, modeling, and politics: on the tensions of collaborative decision support.地理信息系统、建模与政治:论协作式决策支持中的紧张关系
J Environ Manage. 2009 May;90(6):1972-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.029. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
4
Local and regional partnerships in natural resource management: the challenge of bridging institutional levels.自然资源管理中的地方和区域伙伴关系:跨越制度层面的挑战。
Environ Manage. 2010 Nov;46(5):711-24. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9560-9. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
5
An inventory of collaborative arrangements between Aboriginal peoples and the Canadian forest sector: linking policies to diversification in forms of engagement.原住民与加拿大林业部门合作安排清单:将政策与参与形式的多样化联系起来。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Apr 15;119:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
6
Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.共同管理的演变:知识生成、桥梁组织与社会学习的作用
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1692-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
7
Building partnerships for linking biomedical science with traditional knowledge of customary medicines: a case study with two Australian Indigenous communities.建立伙伴关系,将生物医学科学与习惯药物的传统知识联系起来:与两个澳大利亚土著社区的案例研究。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019 Dec 23;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13002-019-0348-6.
8
Building partnership capacity for the collaborative management of marine protected areas in the UK: a preliminary analysis.构建英国海洋保护区合作管理的伙伴关系能力:初步分析
J Environ Manage. 2005 Nov;77(3):227-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.004. Epub 2005 Sep 22.
9
Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes.陆地保护区的良好治理:框架、原则和绩效成果。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Jan-Feb;91(3):754-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
10
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.

引用本文的文献

1
A Typology of National Park Co-management Agreements in the Era of Reconciliation in Canada.加拿大和解时代的国家公园共同管理协议类型学。
Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;74(3):564-589. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01997-z. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
2
Empowering Indigenous natural hazards management in northern Australia.赋能澳大利亚北部的本土灾害管理。
Ambio. 2022 Nov;51(11):2240-2260. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01743-x. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Indigenous guardians as an emerging approach to indigenous environmental governance.本土守护者作为一种新兴的本土环境治理方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.共同管理的演变:知识生成、桥梁组织与社会学习的作用
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1692-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
2
Community-based conservation in a globalized world.全球化世界中的社区保护。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15188-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702098104. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
3
Co-management: concepts and methodological implications.共同管理:概念与方法学意义
Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):179-189. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13532. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
4
Adaptive co-management of conservation conflicts - An interactional experiment in the context of German national parks.保护冲突的适应性共同管理——德国国家公园背景下的一项互动实验。
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 2;4(10):e00890. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00890. eCollection 2018 Oct.
J Environ Manage. 2005 Apr;75(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008.