医疗设备：适应比较疗效格局。
Medical devices: adapting to the comparative effectiveness landscape.
作者信息
Mohandas Anita, Foley Kathleen A
出版信息
Biotechnol Healthc. 2010 Summer;7(2):25-8.
Abstract
Outcomes research for medical devices has always lagged, with good reason. Comparative effectiveness initiatives, though, will soon spur demand for more and better data, and that means more and better outcomes research training.
摘要
医疗器械的疗效研究一直滞后，这是有充分理由的。不过，比较疗效倡议很快将刺激对更多、更好数据的需求，这意味着需要更多、更好的疗效研究培训。
相似文献
1
Medical devices: adapting to the comparative effectiveness landscape.
Biotechnol Healthc. 2010 Summer;7(2):25-8.
2
Nine years of comparative effectiveness research education and training: initiative supported by the PhRMA Foundation.
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):167-175. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0059. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Nanotechnology: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(19):1-43. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
4
Methodological considerations in observational comparative effectiveness research for implantable medical devices: an epidemiologic perspective.
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Nov 1;180(9):949-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu206. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
5
A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy.
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1438718. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1438718.
6
Comparative effectiveness research under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: can new bottles accommodate old wine?
Am J Law Med. 2011;37(4):522-66. doi: 10.1177/009885881103700402.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Supporting Imagers' VOICE: A National Training Program in Comparative Effectiveness Research and Big Data Analytics.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Oct;15(10):1451-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
Neonatology. 2014;105(4):350-1. doi: 10.1159/000360650. Epub 2014 May 30.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparison of devices used to measure blood pressure, grip strength and lung function: A randomised cross-over study.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 27;18(12):e0289052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289052. eCollection 2023.
2
A Systematic Review of the Level of Evidence in Economic Evaluations of Medical Devices: The Example of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 10;10(12):e0144892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144892. eCollection 2015.
本文引用的文献
1
Modernizing device regulation.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1161-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000447. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
2
Long-term safety and efficacy with paclitaxel-eluting stents: 5-year final results of the TAXUS IV clinical trial (TAXUS IV-SR: Treatment of De Novo Coronary Disease Using a Single Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent).
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1248-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.003.
3
Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.008.
4
Medicare and medical technology--the growing demand for relevant outcomes.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):377-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912062. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
5
Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices.
JAMA. 2009 Dec 23;302(24):2679-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1899.
6
Endovascular stents for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and economic model.
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13(48):1-189, 215-318, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta13480.
7
Outcomes following vaginal prolapse repair and mid urethral sling (OPUS) trial--design and methods.
Clin Trials. 2009 Apr;6(2):162-71. doi: 10.1177/1740774509102605.
8
Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review.
Pain Physician. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):379-97.
9
The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1550-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0902377. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
10
Medical errors in orthopaedics. Results of an AAOS member survey.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):547-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01439.
Zotero 插件