Suppr超能文献

吗氯贝胺(Ro 11 - 1163)与反苯环丙胺治疗内源性抑郁症的对比研究

Moclobemide (Ro 11-1163) versus tranylcypromine in the treatment of endogenous depression.

作者信息

Gabelic I, Kuhn B

机构信息

Ospedale neuropsichiatrico cantonale, Mendrisio, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05334.x.

Abstract

In this study, moclobemide (100-350 mg daily) was compared with tranylcypromine (10-30 mg daily) in 40 patients with endogenous depression. Treatment was randomly allocated and most patients also received benzodiazepines or mild neuroleptics concomitantly. Improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at the end of treatment was 66% for moclobemide and 41% for tranylcypromine patients. There were 3 suspected tyramine reactions in patients on tranylcypromine. Tolerance was considered good or very good for 95% of moclobemide patients, and for 75% of tranylcypromine patients. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory data were attributed to either of the trial drugs. The results clearly favour moclobemide over tranylcypromine for both efficacy and tolerance in the treatment of endogenous depression.

摘要

在本研究中,对40例内源性抑郁症患者比较了吗氯贝胺(每日100 - 350毫克)与反苯环丙胺(每日10 - 30毫克)的疗效。治疗是随机分配的,大多数患者还同时接受了苯二氮䓬类药物或轻度抗精神病药物。治疗结束时,吗氯贝胺组患者在汉密尔顿抑郁量表上的改善率为66%,反苯环丙胺组为41%。反苯环丙胺组有3例疑似酪胺反应。95%的吗氯贝胺患者和75%的反苯环丙胺患者耐受性良好或非常好。两种试验药物均未导致实验室数据出现临床相关变化。结果表明,在治疗内源性抑郁症方面,吗氯贝胺在疗效和耐受性上均明显优于反苯环丙胺。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验