• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即使在采用限制性输血策略的重症患者中,红细胞输血也会使治疗结果恶化。

Red blood cell transfusions worsen the outcomes even in critically ill patients undergoing a restrictive transfusion strategy.

作者信息

Silva Junior João Manoel da, Rezende Ederlon, Amendola Cristina Prada, Tomita Rafael, Torres Daniele, Ferrari Maria Tereza, Toledo Diogo Oliveira, Oliveira Amanda Maria Ribas Rosa, Marques Juliana Andreia

机构信息

Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(2):77-83. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000200002.

DOI:10.1590/s1516-31802012000200002
PMID:22481752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10896563/
Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Anemia and blood transfusions are common in intensive care. This study aimed to evaluate epidemiology and outcomes among critically ill patients under a restrictive transfusion strategy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective observational cohort study in an intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

All adults admitted to the ICU over a one-year period who remained there for more than 72 hours were included, except those with acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, acute hemorrhage, prior transfusion, pregnant women and Jehovah's Witnesses. The restrictive strategy consisted of transfusion indicated when hemoglobin levels were less than or equal to 7.0 g/dl.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 167 patients; the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 28.9 ± 6.5. The baseline hemoglobin level was 10.6 ± 2.2 g/dl and on day 28, it was 8.2 ± 1.3 g/dl (P < 0.001). Transfusions were administered to 35% of the patients. In the transfusion group, 61.1% did not survive, versus 48.6% in the non-transfusion group (P = 0.03). Transfusion was an independent risk factor for mortality (P = 0.011; odds ratio, OR = 2.67; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.25 to 5.69). ICU stay and hospital stay were longer in the transfusion group: 20.0 (3.0-83.0) versus 8.0 (3.0-63.0) days (P < 0,001); and 24.0 (3.0-140.0) versus 14.0 (3.0-80.0) days (P = 0.002), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, there was a reduction in hemoglobin with increasing length of ICU stay. Moreover, transfusion was associated with worse prognoses.

摘要

背景与目的

贫血和输血在重症监护中很常见。本研究旨在评估采用限制性输血策略的重症患者的流行病学情况及预后。

设计与地点

在一家三级医院的重症监护病房(ICU)进行的前瞻性观察队列研究。

方法

纳入在一年期间入住ICU且停留时间超过72小时的所有成年患者,但急性冠状动脉综合征、缺血性中风、急性出血、既往输血、孕妇和耶和华见证会成员除外。限制性策略为当血红蛋白水平小于或等于7.0 g/dl时进行输血。

结果

该研究纳入了167例患者;急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分为28.9±6.5。基线血红蛋白水平为10.6±2.2 g/dl,在第28天时为8.2±1.3 g/dl(P<0.001)。35%的患者接受了输血。在输血组中,61.1%的患者未存活,而非输血组为48.6%(P = 0.03)。输血是死亡的独立危险因素(P = 0.011;比值比,OR = 2.67;95%置信区间,CI = 1.25至5.69)。输血组的ICU住院时间和住院时间更长:分别为20.0(3.0 - 83.0)天和8.0(3.0 - 63.0)天(P<0.001);以及24.0(3.0 - 140.0)天和14.0(3.0 - 80.0)天(P = 0.002)。

结论

在重症患者中,随着ICU住院时间的延长,血红蛋白水平降低。此外,输血与更差的预后相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/61390c690be5/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/20d8ee3fa5cc/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/782203d860d0/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/61390c690be5/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/20d8ee3fa5cc/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/782203d860d0/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f5d/10896563/61390c690be5/1806-9460-spmj-130-02-77-gf3.jpg

相似文献

1
Red blood cell transfusions worsen the outcomes even in critically ill patients undergoing a restrictive transfusion strategy.即使在采用限制性输血策略的重症患者中,红细胞输血也会使治疗结果恶化。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(2):77-83. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000200002.
2
Long length of stay in the ICU associates with a high erythrocyte transfusion rate in critically ill patients.重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间长与危重症患者红细胞输注率高相关。
J Int Med Res. 2019 May;47(5):1948-1957. doi: 10.1177/0300060519832458. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients.危重症患者的贫血与输血
JAMA. 2002 Sep 25;288(12):1499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.12.1499.
4
Is a low transfusion threshold safe in critically ill patients with cardiovascular diseases?对于患有心血管疾病的危重症患者,较低的输血阈值是否安全?
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):227-34. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00001.
5
Transfusion strategies for patients in pediatric intensive care units.儿科重症监护病房患者的输血策略。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 19;356(16):1609-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066240.
6
The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill--current clinical practice in the United States.CRIT研究:危重症患者的贫血与输血——美国当前的临床实践
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104112.34142.79.
7
Blood transfusion practice in critically ill patients: a single institutional experience.危重症患者的输血实践:单机构经验。
Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(6):560-5. doi: 10.1159/000338887. Epub 2012 May 25.
8
Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.重组人促红细胞生成素对危重症患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2827-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2827.
9
Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients admitted to a long-term acute care facility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.重组人促红细胞生成素对入住长期急性护理机构的重症患者的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2310-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233873.17954.42.
10
A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.一项关于重症监护中输血需求的多中心、随机、对照临床试验。重症监护输血需求研究人员,加拿大重症监护试验组。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):409-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400601.

引用本文的文献

1
Transfusion of stored autologous blood in patients with low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei: A retrospective analysis of its safety and outcome.低度黏液性腹膜假黏液瘤患者自体库存血输注:安全性及结局的回顾性分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 6;12:1022426. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1022426. eCollection 2022.
2
Post-operative of bleeding, haemolysis and coagulation in mechanical circulatory support patients.机械循环支持患者术后的出血、溶血及凝血情况。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(13):832. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-405.
3
Is haemoglobin below 7.0 g/dL an optimal trigger for allogenic red blood cell transfusion in patients admitted to intensive care units? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial.心脏手术后的输血需求:TRACS 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2010 Oct 13;304(14):1559-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1446.
2
Anemia and blood transfusion in a surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房的贫血与输血。
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R92. doi: 10.1186/cc9026. Epub 2010 May 24.
3
Complications and prognosis of intraoperative blood transfusion.术中输血的并发症与预后。
血红蛋白水平低于 7.0 g/dL 是否为 ICU 患者输注异体红细胞的最佳触发点?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e030854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030854.
4
Anaemia and transfusion triggers in critically ill patients - What we have learnt thus far.危重症患者的贫血与输血触发因素——我们目前所了解的情况。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 Nov;20(4):284-289. doi: 10.1177/1751143718783615. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Randomized Controlled Study on Safety and Feasibility of Transfusion Trigger Score of Emergency Operations.急诊手术输血触发评分安全性与可行性的随机对照研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Jul 5;128(13):1801-8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.159357.
6
Association of red blood cell transfusion and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房患者红细胞输注与院内死亡率的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 14;18(6):515. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0515-z.
7
Anaemia secondary to critical illness: an unexplained phenomenon.危重症继发贫血:一种无法解释的现象。
Extrem Physiol Med. 2014 Feb 7;3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2046-7648-3-4.
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008 Sep-Oct;58(5):454-61, 447-54.
4
Influence of tissue perfusion on the outcome of surgical patients who need blood transfusion.组织灌注对需要输血的外科手术患者预后的影响。
J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;24(3):426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
5
Are blood transfusions associated with greater mortality rates? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients study.输血是否与更高的死亡率相关?急性病患者脓毒症发生率研究的结果。
Anesthesiology. 2008 Jan;108(1):31-9. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000296070.75956.40.
6
Risks associated with fresh whole blood and red blood cell transfusions in a combat support hospital.战斗支援医院中新鲜全血和红细胞输血相关的风险
Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2576-81. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000285996.65226.A9.
7
Red blood cell transfusion in clinical practice.临床实践中的红细胞输血
Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):415-26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61197-0.
8
Fresh blood and aged stored blood are equally efficacious in immediately reversing anemia-induced brain oxygenation deficits in humans.新鲜血液和陈旧库存血在立即逆转人类贫血引起的脑氧合不足方面同样有效。
Anesthesiology. 2006 May;104(5):911-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200605000-00005.
9
Blood transfusion is an independent predictor of increased mortality in nonoperatively managed blunt hepatic and splenic injuries.输血是非手术治疗钝性肝脾损伤死亡率增加的独立预测因素。
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):437-44; discussion 444-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000153935.18997.14.
10
Transfusion-related acute lung injury.输血相关急性肺损伤
Blood. 2005 Mar 15;105(6):2266-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2929. Epub 2004 Nov 30.