美国分娩的生命周期评估视角。
Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US.
机构信息
University of Pittsburgh, 949 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
出版信息
Sci Total Environ. 2012 May 15;425:191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Abstract
This study introduces life cycle assessment as a tool to analyze one aspect of sustainability in healthcare: the birth of a baby. The process life cycle assessment case study presented evaluates two common procedures in a hospital, a cesarean section and a vaginal birth. This case study was conducted at Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, which delivers over 10,000 infants per year. The results show that heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), waste disposal, and the production of the disposable custom packs comprise a large percentage of the environmental impacts. Applying the life cycle assessment tool to medical procedures allows hospital decision makers to target and guide efforts to reduce the environmental impacts of healthcare procedures.
摘要
本研究介绍了生命周期评估作为分析医疗保健可持续性的一个方面的工具
婴儿的诞生。所呈现的过程生命周期评估案例研究评估了医院中的两种常见程序，即剖宫产术和阴道分娩。该案例研究在匹兹堡大学医学中心的 Magee-Womens 医院进行，该医院每年分娩超过 10,000 名婴儿。结果表明，加热、通风和空调（HVAC）、废物处理以及一次性定制包装的生产占环境影响的很大比例。将生命周期评估工具应用于医疗程序可以使医院决策者有针对性地指导努力，以减少医疗程序对环境的影响。
相似文献
1
Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US.美国分娩的生命周期评估视角。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 May 15;425:191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响？以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
4
[Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].[新疆维吾尔族妇女既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的调查]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;49(10):736-40.
5
Neonatal outcomes of planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term: Population-based study on 546,842 breech births across the United States between 2008 and 2017.2008 年至 2017 年期间，美国 546842 例臀位足月分娩的基于人群的研究：计划性阴道分娩与计划性剖宫产分娩的新生儿结局比较。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2024 Dec;53(10):102827. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102827. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?剖宫产的费用总是比顺产高吗？
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x.
7
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产：对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.
8
A "bloodless cesarean section" and perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus.“无血剖宫产术”与人类免疫缺陷病毒的围产期传播
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;179(3 Pt 1):708-14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70069-9.
9
Association of Unexpected Newborn Deaths With Changes in Obstetric and Neonatal Process of Care.新生儿意外死亡与产科和新生儿护理过程变化的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2024589. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24589.
10
Obstetric infection control in a developing country.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1993 Mar-Apr;22(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1993.tb01793.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Carbon emissions from clinical activities by speciality in secondary and tertiary care in England: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of routine administrative data.英国二级和三级医疗中各专科临床活动的碳排放：对常规管理数据的探索性横断面分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jun 2;54:101333. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101333. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A Comparative Carbon Footprint and Cost Analysis of Uterine Manipulators for Hysterectomy.子宫切除术子宫操纵器的碳足迹与成本比较分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005949.
3
Global surgery and climate change: how global surgery can prioritise both the health of the planet and its people.全球外科手术与气候变化：全球外科手术如何兼顾地球健康与人类健康。
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02712-9.
4
The Carbon Footprint of Hospital Services and Care Pathways: A State-of-the-Science Review.医院服务与护理路径的碳足迹：科学现状综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Dec;132(12):126002. doi: 10.1289/EHP14754. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
5
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响？以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
6
Interventions to achieve environmentally sustainable operating theatres: an umbrella systematic review using the behaviour change wheel.实现环境可持续型手术室的干预措施：一项使用行为改变轮的综合性系统评价
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7245-7267. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001951.
7
Waste analysis and energy use estimation during MR-HIFU treatment: first steps towards calculating total environmental impact.磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声治疗期间的废物分析与能源使用估算：迈向计算总体环境影响的第一步。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Mar 22;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01655-2.
8
How environmental impact is considered in economic evaluations of critical care: a scoping review.在重症监护的经济评估中如何考虑环境影响：一项范围综述
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;50(1):36-45. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07274-7. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
9
Ecological Burden of Modern Surgery: An Analysis of Total Knee Replacement's Life Cycle.现代外科手术的生态负担：全膝关节置换术生命周期分析
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 18;23:101187. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101187. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
"Green informed consent" in the classroom, clinic, and consultation room.课堂、临床和会诊室中的“绿色知情同意”。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Dec;26(4):507-515. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10163-x. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Reducing the environmental impact of trials: a comparison of the carbon footprint of the CRASH-1 and CRASH-2 clinical trials.降低试验的环境影响：CRASH-1 与 CRASH-2 临床试验的碳足迹比较。
Trials. 2011 Feb 3;12:31. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-31.
2
A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.主动管理与期待管理第三产程的比较：一项瑞典随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2011 Feb;118(3):362-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02800.x. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
3
Comparing the second stage in induced and spontaneous labor.比较诱导分娩和自然分娩的第二产程。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):606-611. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb968.
4
Models for waste life cycle assessment: review of technical assumptions.废弃物生命周期评估模型：技术假设综述。
Waste Manag. 2010 Dec;30(12):2636-48. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.004.
5
Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector.美国医疗保健部门碳足迹的估计。
JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1970-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1610.
6
An observational study of anaesthesia and surgical time in elective caesarean section: spinal compared with general anaesthesia.择期剖宫产麻醉与手术时间的观察性研究：脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的比较
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Oct;18(4):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
7
Management of the third stage of labour--focus group discussions with Swedish midwives.分娩第三阶段的管理——与瑞典助产士的焦点小组讨论。
Midwifery. 2010 Dec;26(6):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
8
Forest products decomposition in municipal solid waste landfills.城市固体废弃物填埋场中的林产品分解
Waste Manag. 2006;26(4):321-33. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.002. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
Zotero 插件