• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用自然语言处理工具对电子健康记录进行分析,以评估结肠镜检查质量措施的执行情况。

Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1233-9.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.045. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.045
PMID:22482913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852911/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastroenterology specialty societies have advocated that providers routinely assess their performance on colonoscopy quality measures. Such routine measurement has been hampered by the costs and time required to manually review colonoscopy and pathology reports. Natural language processing (NLP) is a field of computer science in which programs are trained to extract relevant information from text reports in an automated fashion.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the efficiency and potential of NLP-based colonoscopy quality measurement.

DESIGN

In a cross-sectional study design, we used a previously validated NLP program to analyze colonoscopy reports and associated pathology notes. The resulting data were used to generate provider performance on colonoscopy quality measures.

SETTING

Nine hospitals in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health care system.

PATIENTS

Study sample consisted of the 24,157 colonoscopy reports and associated pathology reports from 2008 to 2009.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Provider performance on 7 quality measures.

RESULTS

Performance on the colonoscopy quality measures was generally poor, and there was a wide range of performance. For example, across hospitals, the adequacy of preparation was noted overall in only 45.7% of procedures (range 14.6%-86.1% across 9 hospitals), cecal landmarks were documented in 62.7% of procedures (range 11.6%-90.0%), and the adenoma detection rate was 25.2% (range 14.9%-33.9%).

LIMITATIONS

Our quality assessment was limited to a single health care system in western Pennsylvania.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrates how NLP can mine free-text data in electronic records to measure and report on the quality of care. Even within a single academic hospital system, there is considerable variation in the performance on colonoscopy quality measures, demonstrating the need for better methods to regularly and efficiently assess quality.

摘要

背景

胃肠病学专业学会主张,医务人员应定期评估其结肠镜检查质量措施的执行情况。这种常规测量受到手动审查结肠镜检查和病理报告所需的成本和时间的阻碍。自然语言处理(NLP)是计算机科学的一个领域,其中程序经过训练,可以以自动化的方式从文本报告中提取相关信息。

目的

展示基于 NLP 的结肠镜检查质量测量的效率和潜力。

设计

在一项横断面研究设计中,我们使用了经过验证的 NLP 程序来分析结肠镜检查报告和相关的病理笔记。由此产生的数据用于生成医务人员在结肠镜检查质量措施上的表现。

设置

匹兹堡大学医学中心医疗系统的 9 家医院。

患者

研究样本由 2008 年至 2009 年的 24157 份结肠镜检查报告和相关病理报告组成。

主要观察指标

7 项质量措施的提供者表现。

结果

结肠镜检查质量措施的表现普遍较差,且表现差异很大。例如,在各个医院,准备的充分性仅在 45.7%的手术中得到记录(9 家医院的范围为 14.6%-86.1%),盲肠标志物在 62.7%的手术中得到记录(范围为 11.6%-90.0%),腺瘤检出率为 25.2%(范围为 14.9%-33.9%)。

局限性

我们的质量评估仅限于宾夕法尼亚州西部的一个单一医疗系统。

结论

我们的研究说明了 NLP 如何挖掘电子记录中的自由文本数据,以衡量和报告护理质量。即使在单一的学术医院系统中,结肠镜检查质量措施的执行情况也存在相当大的差异,这表明需要更好的方法来定期、有效地评估质量。

相似文献

1
Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures.应用自然语言处理工具对电子健康记录进行分析,以评估结肠镜检查质量措施的执行情况。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1233-9.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.045. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
2
Colonoscopy quality, quality measures, and a natural language processing tool for electronic health records.结肠镜检查质量、质量指标以及用于电子健康记录的自然语言处理工具。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1240-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.031.
3
Natural Language Processing Accurately Calculates Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.自然语言处理准确计算腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状息肉的检出率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jul;63(7):1794-1800. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5078-4. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.开发用于测量结肠镜检查程序质量的自然语言处理应用程序。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i150-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000431. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Multi-center colonoscopy quality measurement utilizing natural language processing.利用自然语言处理进行多中心结肠镜检查质量评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;110(4):543-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.51. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
Natural language processing as an alternative to manual reporting of colonoscopy quality metrics.自然语言处理作为结肠镜检查质量指标手动报告的替代方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.049. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.基于自然语言处理的腺瘤解剖学和高级别腺瘤检出率作为质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1844-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.147. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
8
Natural Language Processing for Assessing Quality Indicators in Free-Text Colonoscopy and Pathology Reports: Development and Usability Study.用于评估自由文本结肠镜检查和病理报告质量指标的自然语言处理:开发与可用性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Apr 15;10(4):e35257. doi: 10.2196/35257.
9
Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.季度报告卡对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Accurate Identification of Colonoscopy Quality and Polyp Findings Using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理技术准确识别结肠镜检查质量和息肉发现。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;53(1):e25-e30. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000929.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of an Automated, Real-time Adenoma Detection Rate and Colonoscopy Quality Metrics Calculator.自动化实时腺瘤检出率及结肠镜检查质量指标计算器的开发与验证
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;26(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Emerging applications of NLP and large language models in gastroenterology and hepatology: a systematic review.自然语言处理和大语言模型在胃肠病学和肝病学中的新兴应用:一项系统综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 22;11:1512824. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1512824. eCollection 2024.
3
Closing the Gap: A Critical Examination of Adherence, Inconsistency, and Improvements in Colonoscopy Reporting Practices.弥合差距:对结肠镜检查报告实践中的一致性、不准确性和改进的批判性评估。
Digestion. 2024;105(3):224-231. doi: 10.1159/000538113. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
4
Natural Language Processing Can Automate Extraction of Barrett's Esophagus Endoscopy Quality Metrics.自然语言处理可自动提取巴雷特食管内镜检查质量指标。
medRxiv. 2023 Jul 13:2023.07.11.23292529. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.11.23292529.
5
Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.大数据在胃肠病学研究中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 27;24(3):2458. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032458.
6
Leveraging Natural Language Processing to Extract Features of Colorectal Polyps From Pathology Reports for Epidemiologic Study.利用自然语言处理技术从病理学报告中提取结直肠息肉特征用于流行病学研究。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jan;7:e2200131. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00131.
7
Assessment of Electronic Health Record for Cancer Research and Patient Care Through a Scoping Review of Cancer Natural Language Processing.通过癌症自然语言处理的范围综述评估癌症研究和患者护理的电子健康记录。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jul;6:e2200006. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00006.
8
Leveraging electronic medical record functionality to capture adenoma detection rate.利用电子病历功能捕获腺瘤检出率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 11;12(1):9679. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13943-2.
9
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality.结肠镜检查的质量指标:理想与现实之间的差距。
Clin Endosc. 2022 May;55(3):332-338. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.037. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Power of big data to improve patient care in gastroenterology.大数据改善胃肠病学患者护理的力量。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 May 28;13(3):237-244. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101239. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.开发用于测量结肠镜检查程序质量的自然语言处理应用程序。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i150-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000431. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
2
Natural language processing: an introduction.自然语言处理:入门。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):544-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000464.
3
Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中结肠镜筛查的过度使用。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Aug 8;171(15):1335-43. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.212. Epub 2011 May 9.
4
Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.分析行政数据发现,内镜医师质量指标与结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌相关。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jan;140(1):65-72. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
5
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
6
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.结肠镜检查的质量指标与间隔期癌症风险。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
7
Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice.社区实践中结肠镜监测的应用。
Gastroenterology. 2010 Jan;138(1):73-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.062. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
8
Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.结肠镜检查报告质量评估:多中心联盟的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.034.
9
Quality improvement in gastroenterology: a US perspective.胃肠病学中的质量改进:美国视角
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct;5(10):550-1. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1231. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
10
Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.腺瘤检出率:结肠镜检查质量的真实指标。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1217-20. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9315-3. Epub 2008 May 24.