Suppr超能文献

基于自然语言处理的腺瘤解剖学和高级别腺瘤检出率作为质量指标。

Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.

机构信息

1] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA [2] Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA [3] Co-first authors.

1] Center for Biomedical Research Informatics, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA [2] Co-first authors.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1844-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.147. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to use an open-source natural language-processing tool (NLP) to accurately assess total, anatomic (left and right colon), and advanced adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and to determine how these metrics differ between high- and low-performing endoscopists.

METHODS

An NLP tool was developed using the Apache Unstructured Information Management Architecture and queried all procedure records for screening colonoscopies performed in patients aged 50-75 years at a single institution from April 1998 to December 2013. Validation was performed on 200 procedures and associated pathology reports. The total, left colon, right colon, and advanced ADRs were calculated and physicians were stratified by total ADR (<20% and ≥20%). Comparisons of colonoscopy characteristics and ADR comparisons (advanced, left, right, and right/left ratio) were determined by t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

The total ADR for 34,998 screening colonoscopies from 1998 to 2013 was 20.3%, as determined via NLP. The institutional left and right colon ADRs were 10.1% and 12.5%, respectively. The overall advanced ADR was 4.4%. Endoscopists with total ADRs ≥20% had higher left (12.4%) and right colon (16.4%) ADRs than endoscopists with ADRs <20% (left ADR=5.6%, right ADR=5.8%). Endoscopists with ADRs ≥20% had higher individual right/left ADR ratios than those with low ADRs (1.4 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.4) vs. 1.0 (IQR 0.4), P=0.02). There was a moderate positive correlation between advanced ADR detection and both right (Spearman's rho=0.5, P=0.05) and left colon (Spearman's rho=0.4, P=0.03) ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Institutions should consider the use of anatomic and advanced ADRs determined via natural language processing as a refined measure of colonoscopy quality. The ability to continuously monitor and provide feedback on colonoscopy quality metrics may encourage endoscopists to refine technique, resulting in overall improvements in adenoma detection.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用开源自然语言处理工具(NLP)准确评估总、解剖(左、右结肠)和高级腺瘤检出率(ADR),并确定这些指标在高、低绩效内镜医师之间的差异。

方法

使用 Apache 非结构化信息管理架构开发了一种 NLP 工具,并查询了 1998 年 4 月至 2013 年 12 月在一家机构接受 50-75 岁患者筛查结肠镜检查的所有程序记录。在 200 个程序和相关病理报告上进行了验证。计算了总、左结肠、右结肠和高级 ADR,并按总 ADR(<20%和≥20%)分层医生。通过 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较了结肠镜检查特征和 ADR 比较(高级、左、右和右/左比)。

结果

通过 NLP 确定,1998 年至 2013 年 34998 例筛查结肠镜检查的总 ADR 为 20.3%。机构左、右结肠 ADR 分别为 10.1%和 12.5%。总高级 ADR 为 4.4%。总 ADR≥20%的内镜医师的左(12.4%)和右结肠(16.4%)ADR 高于 ADR<20%的内镜医师(左 ADR=5.6%,右 ADR=5.8%)。ADR≥20%的内镜医师的个体右/左 ADR 比值高于 ADR 较低的内镜医师(1.4(四分位距(IQR)0.4)比 1.0(IQR 0.4),P=0.02)。高级 ADR 检测与右(Spearman's rho=0.5,P=0.05)和左结肠(Spearman's rho=0.4,P=0.03)ADR 之间存在中度正相关。

结论

各机构应考虑使用自然语言处理确定的解剖和高级 ADR,作为结肠镜质量的精细衡量标准。能够持续监测和提供对结肠镜质量指标的反馈,可能会鼓励内镜医师改进技术,从而整体提高腺瘤检出率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验