CERI Kurume, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, 839-0801, Japan.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012 Aug;63(2):241-8. doi: 10.1007/s00244-012-9761-8. Epub 2012 Apr 7.
Existing regulatory criteria for bioaccumulation assessment of chemicals are mainly based on a bioconcentration factors (BCF) not a biomagnification factors (BMF). We performed dietary exposure tests for nine poorly water-soluble chemicals and developed a linear regression between the 5 % lipid normalized BCF (BCF(L)) and the lipid-corrected BMF (BMF(L)). The BMF(L) of substances with BCF(L) = 5,000 was 0.31 (95 % CI 0.11-0.87), whereas the BCF(L) of substances with BMF(L) = 1 was 13,000 (95 % CI 5,600-30,000). Five substances can be considered very bioaccumulative (vB) according to the BCF end point (BCF > 5,000), but only two substances were recognized to biomagnify according to the BMF end point (BMF ≥ 1). Although our results are highly suggestive of a relationship between BCF and BMF, additional BMF and trophic magnification factor data for chemicals are required to support this relationship, and new techniques (e.g., fugacity approach) may help in resolving the apparent contradiction in hazard categorization.
现有的化学物质生物蓄积性评估监管标准主要基于生物浓缩系数(BCF),而不是生物放大系数(BMF)。我们对 9 种水溶性较差的化学物质进行了饮食暴露测试,并建立了 5%脂重归一化 BCF(BCF(L))与脂重校正 BMF(BMF(L))之间的线性回归。BCF(L)为 5,000 的物质的 BMF(L)为 0.31(95%置信区间 0.11-0.87),而 BMF(L)为 1 的物质的 BCF(L)为 13,000(95%置信区间 5,600-30,000)。根据 BCF 终点(BCF > 5,000),有 5 种物质可被认为是非常易生物蓄积的(vB),但根据 BMF 终点(BMF ≥ 1),只有 2 种物质被认为具有生物放大作用。尽管我们的结果强烈表明 BCF 和 BMF 之间存在关系,但需要更多的 BMF 和营养级放大因子数据来支持这种关系,并且新技术(例如逸度方法)可能有助于解决危害分类中的明显矛盾。