Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Br J Haematol. 2012 Jun;157(6):732-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
To define high-risk acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at onset, we examined the initial GVHD stage and grade of 864 patients at the University of Minnesota who received uniform therapy with prednisone 60 mg/m(2) per d. We compared the prognostic utility of the Minnesota (MN; modified from Consensus) versus Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) GVHD organ stage-derived grading systems. As neither GVHD grading system optimally predicted outcomes, a novel acute GVHD risk score was devised by combining the MN and CIBMTR systems. Using multiple regression analysis, we could dichotomize patients into high risk (HR, n = 86) acute GVHD with initial grade IIIC, IIID or IVD who were less likely to respond to steroid therapy by day 28 [relative risk (RR), 0·3, P < 0·001] and had a higher risk for transplant-related mortality (RR, 2·0, P < 0·001) than patients with standard risk (SR, initial grade IA-IIIB, n = 778) GVHD. Using this novel acute GVHD Risk Score, HR GVHD is either skin stage 4, lower gastrointestinal (GI) stage 3+, liver stage 3+, or skin stage 3 and lower GI or liver stage 2+ GVHD. Patients with HR acute GVHD have a poor prognosis, require alternative initial therapy and should be the focus of novel therapeutic trials.
为了定义高风险急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),我们研究了明尼苏达大学 864 名接受泼尼松 60mg/m(2) 每日治疗的患者的初始 GVHD 阶段和分级。我们比较了明尼苏达(MN;从共识中修改)与国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(CIBMTR)GVHD 器官分期分级系统的预后效用。由于这两个 GVHD 分级系统都不能最优地预测结局,我们设计了一种新的急性 GVHD 风险评分,方法是将 MN 和 CIBMTR 系统结合起来。通过多元回归分析,我们可以将患者分为高风险(HR,n = 86)急性 GVHD,这些患者在初始时的分级为 IIIIC、IIID 或 IVD,不太可能在第 28 天对类固醇治疗有反应[相对风险(RR),0·3,P < 0·001],并且有更高的移植相关死亡率风险(RR,2·0,P < 0·001),而标准风险(SR,初始分级为 IA-IIIB,n = 778)GVHD 患者。使用这种新的急性 GVHD 风险评分,HR GVHD 要么是皮肤 4 级,下胃肠道(GI)3+级,肝脏 3+级,要么是皮肤 3 级和下胃肠道或肝脏 2+级 GVHD。患有 HR 急性 GVHD 的患者预后不良,需要替代初始治疗,应成为新型治疗试验的重点。