Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1771-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825762b7.
Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of administrative data.
To examine the relationship between regional chiropractic supply and both use and utilization intensity of chiropractic services among Medicare beneficiaries.
Numerous studies have documented trends and patterns in the utilization of chiropractic services in the United States, but little is known about geographic variation in the relationship between chiropractic supply and utilization.
We analyzed Medicare claims data for services provided by chiropractic physicians in 2008. We aggregated the data to the hospital referral region level and used small area analysis techniques to generate descriptive statistics. We mapped geographic variations in chiropractic supply, use and utilization intensity (treatments per user), and quantified the variation by coefficient of variation and extremal ratio. We used Spearman rank correlation coefficient to correlate use with supply. We used a logistic regression model for chiropractic use and a multiple linear regression model for chiropractic utilization intensity.
The average regional supply of chiropractic physicians was 21.5 per 100,000 adult capita. The average percentage of beneficiaries who used chiropractic was approximately 7.6 (SD, 3.9). The average utilization intensity was 10.6 (SD, 1.8). Regional chiropractic supply varied more than 14-fold, and chiropractic use varied more than 17-fold. Chiropractic supply and use were positively correlated (Spearman ρ, 0.68; P < 0.001). A low back or cervical spine problem was strongly associated with chiropractic use (odds ratios, 21.6 and 14.3, respectively). Increased chiropractic supply was associated with increased chiropractic use (odds ratio, 1.04) but not with increased chiropractic utilization intensity.
Both the supply of chiropractors and the utilization of chiropractic by older US adults varied widely by region. Increased chiropractic supply was associated with increased chiropractic use but not with increased chiropractic utilization intensity. Utilization of chiropractic care is likely sensitive to both supply and patient preference.
回顾性横截面分析的行政数据。
调查区域脊骨疗法供应与医疗保险受益人的脊骨疗法服务使用和利用强度之间的关系。
许多研究记录了在美国,脊骨疗法服务利用的趋势和模式,但对脊骨疗法供应与利用之间的地理差异知之甚少。
我们分析了 2008 年脊骨疗法医生提供的医疗保险索赔数据。我们将数据汇总到医院转诊区域级别,并使用小区域分析技术生成描述性统计数据。我们绘制了脊骨疗法供应、使用和利用强度(每个使用者的治疗次数)的地理变化图,并通过变异系数和极值比量化了变化。我们使用 Spearman 秩相关系数来关联使用与供应。我们使用逻辑回归模型进行脊骨疗法使用分析,使用多元线性回归模型进行脊骨疗法利用强度分析。
脊骨疗法医生的平均区域供应为每 10 万成人 21.5 人。大约 7.6%(标准差,3.9%)的受益人群使用脊骨疗法。平均利用强度为 10.6(标准差,1.8)。区域脊骨疗法供应差异超过 14 倍,脊骨疗法使用差异超过 17 倍。脊骨疗法供应和使用呈正相关(Spearman ρ,0.68;P<0.001)。下背部或颈椎问题与脊骨疗法使用密切相关(优势比分别为 21.6 和 14.3)。脊骨疗法供应增加与脊骨疗法使用增加相关(优势比,1.04),但与脊骨疗法利用强度增加无关。
美国老年人的脊骨疗法供应和利用差异很大。脊骨疗法供应增加与脊骨疗法使用增加有关,但与脊骨疗法利用强度增加无关。脊骨疗法护理的利用可能对供应和患者偏好都敏感。