Weeks William B, Leininger Brent, Whedon James M, Lurie Jon D, Tosteson Tor D, Swenson Rand, O'Malley Alistair J, Goertz Christine M
Professor, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH; Director, Health Services and Clinical Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA.
Assistant Professor, Integrative Health and Wellbeing Research Program, Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Feb;39(2):63-75.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) was associated with lower healthcare costs among multiply-comorbid Medicare beneficiaries with an episode of chronic low back pain (cLBP).
We conducted an observational, retrospective study of 2006 to 2012 Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements for 72326 multiply-comorbid patients aged 66 and older with cLBP episodes and 1 of 4 treatment exposures: chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT) alone, CMT followed or preceded by conventional medical care, or conventional medical care alone. We used propensity score weighting to address selection bias.
After propensity score weighting, total and per-episode day Part A, Part B, and Part D Medicare reimbursements during the cLBP treatment episode were lowest for patients who used CMT alone; these patients had higher rates of healthcare use for low back pain but lower rates of back surgery in the year following the treatment episode. Expenditures were greatest for patients receiving medical care alone; order was irrelevant when both CMT and medical treatment were provided. Patients who used only CMT had the lowest annual growth rates in almost all Medicare expenditure categories. While patients who used only CMT had the lowest Part A and Part B expenditures per episode day, we found no indication of lower psychiatric or pain medication expenditures associated with CMT.
This study found that older multiply-comorbid patients who used only CMT during their cLBP episodes had lower overall costs of care, shorter episodes, and lower cost of care per episode day than patients in the other treatment groups. Further, costs of care for the episode and per episode day were lower for patients who used a combination of CMT and conventional medical care than for patients who did not use any CMT. These findings support initial CMT use in the treatment of, and possibly broader chiropractic management of, older multiply-comorbid cLBP patients.
本研究旨在确定整脊手法治疗(CMT)的使用是否与患有慢性腰痛(cLBP)发作的多重共病医疗保险受益人的医疗费用降低相关。
我们对2006年至2012年医疗保险按服务收费报销情况进行了一项观察性回顾性研究,涉及72326名66岁及以上患有cLBP发作且有以下4种治疗暴露之一的多重共病患者:单独使用整脊手法治疗(CMT)、在CMT之前或之后接受传统医疗护理、或仅接受传统医疗护理。我们使用倾向评分加权来解决选择偏倚问题。
经过倾向评分加权后,在cLBP治疗期间,单独使用CMT的患者的A部分、B部分和D部分医疗保险报销总额及每日每发作的报销费用最低;这些患者下腰痛的医疗使用率较高,但在治疗发作后的一年中进行背部手术的比率较低。仅接受医疗护理的患者支出最高;当同时提供CMT和医疗治疗时,顺序无关紧要。仅使用CMT的患者在几乎所有医疗保险支出类别中的年增长率最低。虽然仅使用CMT的患者每发作日A部分和B部分的支出最低,但我们没有发现与CMT相关的精神科或止痛药支出降低的迹象。
本研究发现,在cLBP发作期间仅使用CMT的老年多重共病患者与其他治疗组的患者相比总体护理成本更低、发作时间更短且每发作日的护理成本更低。此外,使用CMT和传统医疗护理相结合的患者的发作护理成本和每发作日护理成本低于未使用任何CMT的患者。这些发现支持在治疗老年多重共病cLBP患者时初始使用CMT,并可能进行更广泛的整脊管理。