Suppr超能文献

颈部疼痛的手法治疗或松动术:一项Cochrane系统评价

Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review.

作者信息

Gross Anita, Miller Jordan, D'Sylva Jonathan, Burnie Stephen J, Goldsmith Charles H, Graham Nadine, Haines Ted, Brønfort Gert, Hoving Jan L

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1C7, Canada.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 26.

Abstract

Manipulation and mobilisation are often used, either alone or combined with other treatment approaches, to treat neck pain. This review assesses if manipulation or mobilisation improves pain, function/disability, patient satisfaction, quality of life (QoL), and global perceived effect (GPE) in adults experiencing neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radicular findings. A computerised search was performed in July 2009. Randomised trials investigating manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain were included. Two or more authors independently selected studies, abstracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Pooled relative risk (pRR) and standardised mean differences (pSMD) were calculated. 33% of 27 trials had a low risk of bias. Moderate quality evidence showed cervical manipulation and mobilisation produced similar effects on pain, function and patient satisfaction at intermediate-term follow-up. Low quality evidence suggested cervical manipulation may provide greater short-term pain relief than a control (pSMD -0.90 (95%CI: -1.78 to -0.02)). Low quality evidence also supported thoracic manipulation for pain reduction (NNT 7; 46.6% treatment advantage) and increased function (NNT 5; 40.6% treatment advantage) in acute pain and immediate pain reduction in chronic neck pain (NNT 5; 29% treatment advantage). Optimal technique and dose need to be determined.

摘要

手法治疗和松动术经常单独或与其他治疗方法联合使用,以治疗颈部疼痛。本综述评估手法治疗或松动术是否能改善伴有或不伴有颈源性头痛或神经根症状的成人颈部疼痛患者的疼痛、功能/残疾情况、患者满意度、生活质量(QoL)和整体感知效果(GPE)。2009年7月进行了计算机检索。纳入了调查手法治疗或松动术治疗颈部疼痛的随机试验。由两名或更多作者独立选择研究、提取数据并评估方法学质量。计算合并相对风险(pRR)和标准化均数差(pSMD)。27项试验中有33%的偏倚风险较低。中等质量证据表明,在中期随访时,颈椎手法治疗和松动术对疼痛、功能和患者满意度产生相似的效果。低质量证据表明,颈椎手法治疗可能比对照组提供更大的短期疼痛缓解(pSMD -0.90(95%CI:-1.78至-0.02))。低质量证据还支持胸椎手法治疗可减轻急性疼痛(NNT 7;治疗优势46.6%)和增加功能(NNT 5;治疗优势40.6%),以及减轻慢性颈部疼痛的即时疼痛(NNT 5;治疗优势29%)。需要确定最佳技术和剂量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验