Suppr超能文献

利用光泽作为线索检测垂直眼间相位差异。

Detection of vertical interocular phase disparities using luster as cue.

机构信息

McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Montreal General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Vis. 2023 Jun 1;23(6):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.6.10.

Abstract

Interocular disparities in contrast generate an impression of binocular luster, providing a cue for their detection. Disparities in the carrier spatial phase of horizontally oriented Gabor patches also generate an impression of luster, so the question arises as to whether it is the disparities in local contrast that accompany the phase disparities that give rise to the luster. We examined this idea by comparing the detection of interocular spatial phase disparities with that of interocular contrast disparities in Gabor patches, in the latter case that differed in overall contrast rather than phase between the eyes. When bandwidth was held constant and Gabor spatial frequency was varied, the detection of phase and contrast disparities followed a similar pattern. However, when spatial frequency was fixed and Gabor envelope standard deviation (and hence number of modulation cycles) was varied, thresholds for detecting phase disparities followed a U-shaped function of Gabor standard deviation, whereas thresholds for contrast disparities, following an initial decline, were more-or-less constant as a function of Gabor standard deviation. After reviewing a number of possible explanations for the U-shape found with phase disparities, we suggest that the likely cause is binocular sensory fusion, the strength of which increases with the number of modulation cycles. Binocular sensory fusion would operate to reduce phase but not contrast disparities, thus selectively elevating phase disparity thresholds.

摘要

双眼视差中的对比度差异会产生双眼光泽的感觉,为其检测提供线索。水平方向的 Gabor 贴片载波空间相位的视差也会产生光泽的感觉,因此出现了这样一个问题,即是否是伴随相位差异的局部对比度差异导致了光泽。我们通过比较双眼空间相位差异和双眼对比度差异在 Gabor 贴片中的检测来检验这一观点,在后一种情况下,两眼之间的差异仅在于对比度而不是相位。当带宽保持不变且 Gabor 空间频率变化时,相位和对比度差异的检测遵循相似的模式。然而,当空间频率固定且 Gabor 包络标准差(因此调制周期数)变化时,检测相位差异的阈值遵循 Gabor 标准差的 U 形函数,而对比度差异的阈值在初始下降后,几乎随着 Gabor 标准差的变化而保持不变。在回顾了相位差异中发现的 U 形的几种可能解释之后,我们认为可能的原因是双眼感觉融合,其强度随调制周期数的增加而增加。双眼感觉融合会降低相位但不降低对比度差异,从而选择性地提高相位差异阈值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f46/10284308/78a7a939c99a/jovi-23-6-10-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验