Suppr超能文献

Safety and acceptance of non-sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Garg Pankaj Kumar, Singh Abhishek Pratap, Jain Bhupendra Kumar, Bansal Amit, Mohanty Debajyoti, Agrawal Vivek

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 May;22(4):315-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0463. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted to assess the patient acceptability of non-sedated upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and to study cardiorespiratory changes during the procedure.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in the outpatient endoscopy room of Department of Surgery of a teaching tertiary-care hospital in North India. The patients underwent diagnostic GI endoscopy under topical pharyngeal anesthesia using 5% lidocaine. No sedation was used. Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and mean blood pressure (BP) were recorded immediately prior to endoscopy, during endoscopy, and 5, 15, and 30 minutes after endoscopy. Using a 10-point Likert scale, all the patients were asked to record their expected discomfort for the endoscopy as a pre-test score and their actual level of discomfort during endoscopy as a post-test score. Patients were also asked about whether they would opt for non-sedated upper GI endoscopy again in the future if required.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent diagnostic upper GI endoscopy during the study period. Post hoc tests using Bonferroni's correction revealed that mean PR, RR, and mean BP changed significantly during endoscopy. However, these parameters normalized at 30 minutes following endoscopy. Mean SpO(2) did not differ significantly at the different time points. Pre- and post-endoscopy mean visual analog scale scores to assess the expected level of discomfort during endoscopy were not statistically different. Forty-four patients (73.3%) indicated their willingness to undergo repeat non-sedated endoscopy in the future if required. Binary logistic regression analysis identified young age, male gender, and long duration of procedure as significant factors for unwillingness to undergo repeat non-sedated endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Non-sedated endoscopy is a feasible, safe, and fast office procedure and seems well tolerated by most patients.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验