Suppr超能文献

[中国西部两省农村留守儿童与非留守儿童的儿童忽视状况]

[The situation of children neglect between left-behind children and living-with-parents children in rural areas of two western provinces of China].

作者信息

Zhong Yin, Zhong Zhao-hui, Pan Jian-ping, Wang Ying-xiong, Liu Chen-yu, Yang Xin, Hu Chen, Cai Lin-li, Xu Ya

机构信息

Epidemiology Research Institute, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;46(1):38-41.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand the children neglect situation of left-behind children (children who do not grow up with their parents) and non-left-behind children in China's western rural and its influencing factors.

METHODS

Scales and evaluation methods in the "Chinese rural child neglected evaluation model" were used in this study. The investigation was conducted by using multistage stratified cluster sampling method; three countries were sampled randomly in Shanxi and Chongqing in November 2010, respectively. And, in every county, children from rural area aged from zero to six were randomly selected, with neglect rate and degree to describe their neglected status, using logistic regression analysis to analyze factors affecting the neglect rate.

RESULTS

Among 1568 subjects (859 left-behind and 709 living-with-parents), the total neglect rates were 29.78% (467/1568), and the total neglect degrees were 48.51 ± 6.49; the neglect rates for left-behind ones and living-with parents ones were 34.34% (295/859) and 24.26% (172/709) (P < 0.05); the neglect degree were 49.59 ± 6.54 and 47.19 ± 6.18 (P < 0.05). The neglect degree among left-behind ones and living-with parents ones between 0 to 2 years old were 48.59 ± 6.33 and 45.78 ± 5.94 (P < 0.05); in 3 to 6 years old group, which were 50.43 ± 6.60 and 48.25 ± 6.16(P < 0.05). The degrees in boy's group of these two kinds of children were 49.83 ± 6.67, 47.36 ± 6.28(P < 0.05) and girl's were 49.32 ± 6.38, 47.01 ± 6.08 (P < 0.05). On the other side, the neglect rate of left-behind and non-left-behind children between 0 to 2 years old were 39.33% (153/389) and 18.54% (56/302) (P < 0.05). The rates of boy's group were 34.91% (162/464) and 25.13% (94/374) (P < 0.05), and girl's were 33.67% (133/395) and 23.28% (78/335) (P < 0.05). Results showed that if the left-behind child's father was with lower education background, and the child and his mother feel stranger to each other, which led to the conclusion there was more chance for them to be neglected (OR values were 1.29 and 1.55, P < 0.05). If the non-neglected child's father was farmer or migrant worker and the relationship between the mother and father was poor, then there was more chance for them to be neglected (OR values were 0.85 and 1.92, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The situation of children neglect in the western rural regions in China is serious. Both the neglect rate and degree among left-behind children are higher than those living-with-parents children. The influencing factors of neglect rate are different in the two groups.

摘要

目的

了解中国西部农村留守儿童(父母双方或一方外出务工,自己不能与父母双方共同生活在一起的儿童)和非留守儿童的儿童忽视状况及其影响因素。

方法

本研究采用“中国农村儿童忽视评价模型”中的量表和评价方法。调查采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法;2010年11月分别在山西和重庆随机抽取3个县。在每个县,随机抽取0至6岁农村儿童,用忽视率和忽视度描述其忽视状况,采用logistic回归分析影响忽视率的因素。

结果

在1568名研究对象(859名留守儿童和709名非留守儿童)中,总忽视率为29.78%(467/1568),总忽视度为48.51±6.49;留守儿童和非留守儿童的忽视率分别为34.34%(295/859)和24.26%(172/709)(P<0.05);忽视度分别为49.59±6.54和47.19±6.18(P<0.05)。0至2岁留守儿童和非留守儿童的忽视度分别为48.59±6.33和45.78±5.94(P<0.05);3至6岁组分别为50.43±6.60和48.25±6.16(P<0.05)。这两类儿童中男孩组的忽视度分别为49.83±6.67、47.36±6.28(P<0.05),女孩组分别为49.32±6.38、47.01±6.08(P<0.05)。另一方面,0至2岁留守儿童和非留守儿童的忽视率分别为39.33%(153/389)和18.54%(56/302)(P<0.05)。男孩组的忽视率分别为34.91%(162/464)和25.13%(94/374)(P<0.05),女孩组分别为33.67%(133/395)和23.28%(78/335)(P<0.05)。结果显示,如果留守儿童的父亲文化程度较低,且孩子与母亲关系生疏,则其被忽视的可能性更大(OR值分别为1.29和1.55,P<0.05)。如果非留守儿童的父亲为农民或外出务工人员,且父母关系较差,则其被忽视的可能性更大(OR值分别为0.85和1.92,P<0.05)。

结论

中国西部农村地区儿童忽视状况严重。留守儿童的忽视率和忽视度均高于非留守儿童。两组儿童忽视率的影响因素有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验